62
$\begingroup$

$\color{red}{\mathbf{Problem\!:}}$ $n\geq3$ is a given positive integer, and $a_1 ,a_2, a_3, \ldots ,a_n$ are all given integers that aren't multiples of $n$ and $a_1 + \cdots + a_n$ is also not a multiple of $n$. Prove there are at least $n$ different $(e_1 ,e_2, \ldots ,e_n ) \in \{0,1\}^n $ such that $n$ divides $e_1 a_1 +\cdots +e_n a_n$

$\color{red}{\mathbf{My Approach\!:}}$

We can solve this by induction (not on $n$, as one can see in the answer provided by Thomas Bloom given in the link below). But I approached it in a different way using trigonometric sums. Can we proceed in this way successfully?

$\color{blue}{\text{Reducing modulo $n$ we can assume that $1\leq a_j\leq n-1$}.}$

Throughout this partial approach, $i$ denotes the imaginary unit, i.e. $\color{blue}{i^2=-1}$.

Let $z=e^{\frac{2\pi i}{n}}$. Then $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}z^{mk} =1$ if $n\mid m$ and equals $0$ if $n\nmid m$.

Therefore, if $N$ denotes the number of combinations $e_1a_1+e_2a_2+\cdots+e_na_n$ with $(e_1,e_2,\ldots, e_n)\in\{0,1\}^n$ such that $n\mid(e_1a_1+e_2a_2+\cdots+e_na_n)$, then $N$ is equal to the following sum,

$$\sum_{(e_1,e_2,\ldots, e_n)\in\{0,1\}^n}\left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}z^{j(e_1a_1+e_2a_2+\cdots+e_na_n)}\right)$$

By swapping the order of summation we get, $$N=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\prod_{k=1}^{n}(1+z^{ja_k})$$

Clearly, the problem is equivalent to the following inequality:

$$\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\prod_{k=1}^{n}(1+z^{ja_k})\right|\geq n^2\tag{1}$$

Can we prove this inequality? Any hint or help will be appreciated. Thank you!


$\color{red}{\mathrm{Update:}}$ This is actually IMO shortlist $1991$ problem $13$. No proofs are available except using induction. So if we can prove inequality $(1)$, it will be a completely new proof! In fact, inequality $(1)$ is itself very interesting.

$\color{red}{\mathrm{One\, more\, idea\, (maybe\, not\, useful):}}$

Let $\theta_{jk}=\frac{ja_k\pi}{n}$ and $A=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_k$, then we get, $$(1+z^{ja_k})=\left(1+\cos\left(\frac{2ja_k\pi}{n}\right)+i\sin\left(\frac{2ja_k\pi}{n}\right)\right)=2\cos(\theta_{jk})(\cos(\theta_{jk})+i\sin(\theta_{jk}))$$ Therefore,

$$\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\prod_{k=1}^{n}(1+z^{ja_k})\right|=2^n\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\cos(\theta_{jk})e^{i\theta_{jk}}\right|$$

So we get one more equivalent inequality,

$$\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\cos(\theta_{jk})e^{i\theta_{jk}}\right|=\left|\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{\pi Aj}{n}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\cos(\theta_{jk})\right|\geq\frac{n^2}{2^n}\tag{2}$$

$\color{red}{\text{Remark:}}$ According to the hypothesis of the question, $n\nmid A$. Therefore $e^{i\frac{\pi A}{n}}\neq\pm1$.

Also posted on Mathoverflow

The only combinatorial solution using induction is available here.

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Peter yeah, we can take $n\geq 3$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2020 at 18:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (+1) Nr. 18, I wanted to use the pigeonhole-principle , but I could not establish a proof yet. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2020 at 18:20
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Now posted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/365527/… with no notice to either site. Please don't do that. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2020 at 12:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This result and the combinatorial proof given in Mathoverflow have to be refered to: -J.E. Olson, A Problem of Erdos on abelian groups, Combinatorica 7(3) (1987) 285-289 $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 22:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is a solid approach (one that works well in many situations). The next key observation is that the summand corresponding to $j=0$ is very large (it equals $2^n$ in the notation of equation (1)). So it suffices to prove, say, that every other summand is less than $(2^n-n^2)/(n-1)$ in absolute value. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2023 at 19:03

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.