0
$\begingroup$

Why is a matrix considered negative definite iff it has only negative eigenvalues and why is it indefinite iff its eigenvalues have both signs?

What would the relationship between eigenvalues and definiteness be? I found there is a theorem for when a matrix is positive definite and it has positive eigenvalues, but couldn't find one for these two cases. And I tried to look it up but couldn't find a satisfactory answer.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I'm assuming that you are restricting your considerations to Hermitian matrices over $\mathbb{C}^n$ or symmetric matrices over $\mathbb{R}^n$. If the matrices are not Hermitian/symmetric then the statement is not true.

This equivalence between eigenvalues and positive definiteness follows immediately from the spectral theorem. For any Hermitian/symmetric matrix $A$ we can find an orthonormal basis $\{e_i\}$ consisting of its eigenvectors such that in this basis $A$ is diagonal, we can write $$ A = \sum_i \lambda_i e_i e_i^* $$ where $\lambda_i$ is the eigenvalue for the eigenvector $e_i$. Now if we have $\lambda_i \geq 0$ for all $i$ it is straightforward to see that for any vector $x = \sum_i x_i e_i$ we have $$ x^* A x = \sum_i |x_i|^2 \lambda_i \geq 0. $$

Conversely, if $x^* A x \geq 0$ then we have $e_i^* A e_i \geq 0$ which implies $\lambda_i \geq 0$.

You can extend this argument to negative definite matrices and also to construct examples of indefiniteness when A has a mixture of positive and negative eigenvalues.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.