0
$\begingroup$

I came across the german Wikipedia page for the Dodecagon and there it said (my translation) "The regular Hexagon and the regular Dodecagon are the only regular polygons that can be decomposed into smaller regular polygons".

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zw%C3%B6lfeck#Zerlegung_in_regelm%C3%A4%C3%9Fige_Polygone

I object to that as both the equilateral triangle and the square can be decomposed into four smaller copies of themselves.

I believe what the article wants to say is "...into regular polygons with fewer sides".

Is that a better way of phrasing it? Is the fact correct at all? Can someone give me a citation for it? How would one go about proving this?

Regards, Marian

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree with your concerns about the German "kleinere". Perhaps the author intended it to mean fewer sides, not simply physically smaller, and didn't realise the ambiguity. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2021 at 12:12
  • $\begingroup$ Place it in context. They say ""kleineren Zahl von Ecken", which translates literally as "smaller numbers of corners". No I am not that good at German, I had an "English" option when I clicked the link. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2021 at 17:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Oscar - Your translation is correct. It mentions Ecken/corners now after I have taken the liberty of making it a bit more precise. The fact that my edit passed review makes me believe that that may indeed be what was intended. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2021 at 10:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Some interesting additional examples can be found in spherical geometry. The simplest involves dividing a pentagon into five equilateral triangles. Simply inscribe a regular icosahedron in the sphere and use the contact points to define the vertices of the pentagon and its component triangles.

With Archimedean solids we find a couple less obvious examples:

  • A small rhombicuboctahedron inscribed in a sphere contains regular-octagonal loops that encompass four equilarlteral triangles and five squares, allowing that size regular octagon to be divided accordingly.

  • A small rhomicoisdodecahedron similarly contains a regular decagonal loop, which can be divided to give five equilateral triangles, five squares and a regular pentagon. The pentagon in this case is smaller than that in the regular icosahedral loop described above, so a radial division would not yield equilateral triangles.

We may consider these spherical-geometry divisions as relatives of the planar ones in which the curvature of the sphere forces a reduction in the number of sides in the large polygon and any centrally located component polygon. Thus on the plane a regular hexagon is divisible into six equilateral triangles, but on the sphere the number of sides is reduced to five in the inscribed-icosahedron division. Similarly, on the plane the regular dodecagon is divisible into equilateral triangles, squares and a central regular hexagon; the two Archimedean-solid based divisions above reduce the number of outer sides from twelve to eight or ten with the central piece following suit.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.