4
$\begingroup$

I am working in a group called $$\mathrm{UI}_n=\{A\in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q[[t]]) \mid A_{ij}(0) \neq 0 \text{ implies } i\leq j, i=j \text{ implies } A_{ij}(0)=1\}$$

Which can be thought of as the inverse limit indexed by k of $$\mathrm{UI}_n^{(k)}=\{A\in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q[t]/t^k\mathbb{F}_q[t]) \mid A_{ij}(0) \neq 0 \text{ implies } i\leq j, i=j \text{ implies } A_{ij}(0)=1\}$$

I am wondering if knowing the or commutator of each finite part has any relation to the center of commutator of the limit.

Update: I have proven the center of $\mathrm{UI}_n$ are the scalar matrices, which seems to track as those project to some of the center (the center of $\mathrm{UI}_n^{(k)}$ also includes the top right entry) of the finite part, but the commutator seems harder to deal with in $\mathrm{UI}_n.$ Thus, it would be helpful to know if knowing anything about the commutator in each finite part says anything about the commutator of the infinite group.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ See here for context:"I am working over a much bigger group". Is this $UI_n$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 16 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ I am confused about the $nk$ by $nk$ matrices. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 16 at 22:11
  • $\begingroup$ @DietrichBurde yes, but it is clearly not finitely generated, but certain subgroups were less clear $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 17 at 16:11
  • $\begingroup$ @hunter see edit $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 17 at 16:16

2 Answers 2

2
+50
$\begingroup$

You can calculate the commutator of an element from the centraliser of its reductions in a very general case. Let $R$ be a ring that is adically separated with respect to an ideal $I$ (so $\bigcap_{i=k}^\infty I^k = 0$). Given two matrices $A, B \in \mathrm{M}_n(R)$, we denote their reductions to $\mathrm{M}_n(R / I^k)$ by $A_k$ and $B_k$. Then $AB = BA$ if and only if $A_kB_k = B_kA_k$ for all $k$. The implication $\Rightarrow$ is clear, since $R \to R / I^k$ is a ring homomorphism. For $\Leftarrow$, note that $AB - BA$ reduces to $A_kB_k - B_kA_k = 0 \in \mathrm{M}_n(R)$ for all $k$. This means $AB - BA \in \mathrm{M}_n(I^k)$ for all $k$. Since $R$ is $I$-adically complete, this means $AB = BA$.

From this we can deduce that for every subgroup $G \leq \operatorname{Gl}_n(R)$ and every element $x \in G$, the centraliser $\mathrm{Z}_G(x)$ is the intersection of all preimages $\pi_k^{-1}(\mathrm{Z}_{G_k}(x_k))$. Here, $pi_k : \operatorname{Gl}_n(R) \to \operatorname{Gl}_n(R / I^k)$ is the reduction map, $G_k = \pi_k(G)$, and $x_k = \pi_k(x)$. To check this statement, let $y \in G$. Then $y \in \mathrm{Z}_G(x)$ means $xy = yx$, which is equivalent to $x_ky_k = y_kx_k$ for all $k$, i.e. $y_k \in \mathrm{Z}_{G_k}(x_k)$ for all $k$. In other words, $y \in \pi_k^{-1}(\mathrm{Z}_{G_k}(x_k))$.

Now for your concrete case: We can pick $R = \mathbb{F}_q[[t]]$, $I = (t)$, and $G = \mathrm{UI}_n$. Then $G_k = \mathrm{UI}_n^{(k)}$. Then for $x \in \mathrm{UI}_n$, we get $$ \mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{UI}_n}(x) = \bigcap_{k = 1}^\infty\pi_k^{-1}(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{UI}_n^{(k)}}(x_k)) = \varprojlim_k \mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{UI}_n^{(k)}}(x_k) \leq \mathrm{UI_n}. $$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ You showed this for the center, will the same argument work for the commutator subgroup aka the derived subgroup? I believe it should but just making sure $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ I guess I mixed up commutators with centralisers in my head. Sorry. The argument can be salvaged if the ring is $I$-adically complete, I suppose. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ I’m not very informed on projective limits, but I believe my group should be? Could you edit the answer to reflect this? And explain being $I$-adically complete makes it work? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ The only reason I’m not sure about the completion is that I am qouteinting entries of the elements but not the whole group in my construction. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22 at 22:26
0
$\begingroup$

Using the ideas put forth by @Tzimmo I have come up with an answer.

Since $\mathrm{UI}_n-1$ is $I$-adically complete with the ideal $I=(t^k\mathrm{M}_n),$ if a subgroup $H$ of $\mathrm{UI}_n$ satisfies $H/I^k$ normal in $\mathrm{UI}_n/I^k$ for all $k$, then $H$ is normal in $\mathrm{UI}_n$.

Important note: the converse is not true in general, for example, the normal subgroup of $\mathrm{UI}_n$, of elements of determinant 1, has quotients that are not normal in their respective projections.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.