9
$\begingroup$

For an assignment I have to show that exists a densely defined operator on a infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space, such that its adjoint is the zero operator on the zero subspace.

To show this there is a reference to exercise 13.3 in the book Functional Analysis of Rudin. The exercise is as follows

By theorem 13.8, $\mathscr{D}(T^*) =\{0\}$ for a densely defined operator $T$ in $H$ if and only if $\mathscr{G}(T)$ is dense in $H\times H$. Show that this can actually happen. Suggestion: Let $\{e_n:n=1,2,3, \dots\}$ be an orthonormal basis of $H$; let $\{x_n\}$ be a dense subset of $H$; define $Te_n=x_n$; and extend $T$ linearly to $\mathscr{D}(T)$, the set of all finite linear combinations of the basis vector $e_n$. Show that the graph of this $T$ is dense in $H \times H$.

The exercise has been proved here. So now we know that $\mathscr{G}(T)$ is dense in $H \times H$. Then $V\,\mathscr{G}(T)$ is also dense, where $V$ is given by $V\{a,b\}=\{-b,a\}$. According to theorem 13.8 we have

$ \mathscr{G}(T^*) = [V\,\mathscr{G}(T)]^{\perp}. $

Since $V\,\mathscr{G}(T)$ is dense we have that $\mathscr{G}(T^*)$ must be the zero vector. Since

$ \mathscr{G}(T^*) = \{\,\{x,T^*x\} : x \in \mathscr{D}(T^*)\}, $

we can conclude that $\mathscr{D}(T^*) = 0$ and $T^*x=0$, so that $T^*$ is the zero operator. I thought that I'm done here, however the original assignment has the remark:

Once you have the correct idea and also realize that $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}(x,e_n)=0$ for all $x\in H$, the solution is almost immediate.

If $y \in \mathscr{D}(T^*)$ then there exists a $T^*y \in H$ s.t.

$ (Tx,y) = (x,T^*y) \qquad [x \in \mathscr{D}(T)] $

and $x \rightarrow (Tx,y)$ must be continuous in $x$. Letting $x=e_n$ we get

$ (x_n,y) = (e_n,T^*y) $

then using the remark above we see that $(x_n,y) \rightarrow 0$. Using the continuity condition it follows that $\mathscr{D}(T^*)=\{0\}$.

If this is correct it is just another way of proving the assignment. Am I missing something here?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ What exactly was the wording of the original assignment? Did it directly refer to exercise 13.3, or was it only "Show that there is an operator with $\mathscr{D}(T^\ast) = \{0\}$", and then the remark? Once you have shown that the graph of the $T$ constructed in Rudin's suggestion is dense, you are indeed done. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 29, 2013 at 17:14
  • $\begingroup$ It indeed referred directly to exercise 13.3. That's why I thought that the suggestion in exercise 13.3 doesn't show that $T^*$ is also the zero operator only that $\mathscr{D}(T^*)$ is zero. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 29, 2013 at 17:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The adjoint is linear on its domain. So, if the adjoint has the trivial domain {0}, then the adjoint must be 0 on that domain. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 30, 2013 at 4:43

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

If $\{a,b\}$ is an element in the orthocomplement of $\mathscr{G}(T)$, then for $x\in\mathscr{D}(T)$ we have $(x,a)+(Tx,b)=0$. In particular, for $x=e_n$ you get $(e_n,a)+(x_n,b)=0$. Taking the limit $n\rightarrow\infty$, we see that the first term cancels because of the remark. What's left is $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(x_n,b)=0$. Using the density of the set $\{x_n\}$ it's easy to show that this implies $b=0$. Indeed: just take a sequence $x_n$ which converges to $b$.

This just leaves $(x,a)=0$, from which $a=0$ follows since $\mathscr{D}(T)$ is dense. So the orthocomplement of $\mathscr{G}(T)$ is just the zero subspace, from which the density of $\mathscr{G}(T)$ follows.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.