4
$\begingroup$

When integrating by parts, at what point does the constant come in?

The rule has always been like this:

$$ \int u\,dv = uv - \int v\,du $$

The explanation is that this the "reversal" of the product rule:

$$ d(uv) = u\,dv + v\,du $$

But if that is the case, shouldn't a $C$ appear when you integrate both sides?

$$ uv = \int u\,dv + \int v\,du + C \quad ? $$

I've been told to just ignore the $C$ because it will appear in the final integral anyway, like this:

$$ \begin{align*} \int xe^x\,dx &= xe^x - \int e^x\, dx \\ &= xe^x - e^x + C \end{align*} $$

Fine. But what happens when integrating by parts results in the exact same integral as the original?

Like this, first no $C$:

$$ \begin{align*} \int e^x \sin x \, dx &= e^x \sin x - \int e^x \cos x \, dx \\ &= e^x \sin x - \left( e^x \cos x + \int e^x \sin x \, dx \right) \end{align*}$$

Then out of nowhere, a $C$ appears:

$$ \begin{align} 2\int e^x \sin x \, dx &= e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x + C \\ \int e^x \sin x \, dx &= \frac{1}{2} e^x \sin x - \frac{1}{2} e^x \cos x + C \end{align} $$

We know the final result has to contain a $C$, but where does it come from? No integral is being evaluated here, all we did was move the integral from the right to the left.

This is one thing that I think is not being properly taught.

$\endgroup$
11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In principle every time you integrate, you should add a constant, but if you ignore it and just add it in the end, the two final resulting expressions will be equivalent. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 16, 2014 at 23:33
  • $\begingroup$ If you get a $C_1$ on the right and a $C_2$ on the left, you may combine them into one constant term. As such, it suffices to shove in a constant term at the very end. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 16, 2014 at 23:34
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I agree with you that this thing is not properly taught. I am more radical, though, in that I think that it is the very symbol of "indefinite integral" that is flawed and confusing. It should be removed and kept only as a "guilt practice", like treating $dy/dx$ as a real fraction and things like that. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 16, 2014 at 23:38
  • $\begingroup$ @GiuseppeNegro I'm very impressed that someone who works on differential equations thinks like this. Respect. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 16, 2014 at 23:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Constants of integration in integration by parts $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 19, 2018 at 9:26

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

Here's one way to think about it: we reach this step: $$ \int e^x \sin x \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x - \int e^x \sin x \, dx $$ And for our next step, we'd like to add $\int e^x \sin x \, dx$ on both sides, so we do. $$ \int e^x \sin x \, dx + \int e^x \sin x \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x - \int e^x \sin x \, dx + \int e^x \sin x \, dx \\ \int [e^x \sin x + e^x \sin x] \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x + \int [e^x \sin x - e^x \sin x] \, dx \\ \int 2[e^x \sin x] \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x + \int 0\, dx \\ 2\int e^x \sin x \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x + C $$ The intuition is that when we take the antiderivative twice in the same equation, we don't guarantee that the result is the same each time. So, the equation $$ \int e^x \sin x \, dx = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x - \int e^x \sin x \, dx $$ Is really something to the effect of $$ F(x) + C_1 = e^x \sin x - e^x \cos x - [F(x) + C_2] $$ Where $F$ is some antiderivative of $e^x \sin x$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Ah. That makes sense. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 17, 2014 at 0:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.