Timeline for NIntegrate cannot give high precision result for a well-behaved integral
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2024 at 4:06 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 15, 2024 at 11:56 | vote | accept | pisco | ||
| Dec 15, 2024 at 6:09 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 15, 2024 at 2:27 | answer | added | Michael E2 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 14, 2024 at 22:14 | comment | added | pisco | @Nasser Thank you for the comment. Actually my real problems are more complicated integrals involving DawsonF that Integrate cannot solve exactly (e.g. replace square by cube, 4th power etc). The above is a toy example to illustrate the problem I encountered when using NIntegrate on them. | |
| Dec 14, 2024 at 22:09 | comment | added | Nasser | There might be some other options needed. But if you evaluate it exactly, then using N[exact,80] now it gives same result as Maple with no problems. i.sstatic.net/K6nIL7Gy.png 0.91596559417721901505460351493238411077414937428167213426649811962176301977625477 | |
| Dec 14, 2024 at 22:00 | history | asked | pisco | CC BY-SA 4.0 |