Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question is similar to: Associations in replacement rules variable. If you believe it’s different, please edit the question, make it clear how it’s different and/or how the answers on that question are not helpful for your problem. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Domen It's not the same question though.. I'm not even sure how that addresses my question. my question is about the display of the association. The actual content of the output is correct, my replacement rule worked, it just doesn't display right $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23 at 10:55
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest you read through that question and answers (including linked questions in the comments by @WReach). You will see that the problem is not about the display, but about the actual evaluation. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23 at 10:57
  • $\begingroup$ I have read through them. I'm now reading through those linked by WReach, and was so when i left my previous comment. Those are much closer in similarity than the one you proposed, which is why its taking me a bit since i read the entire link you provided first before getting to the more on topic ones I'm vaguely seeing a similar connection about evaluation, but it's not clear, and I genuinely think that this question is different enough in spirit and presentation to warrant it's own answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23 at 11:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ IMO, it's a different evaluation issue than in the proposed duplicate. In the duplicate, it prevented the intended replacement. Here the intended replacement works. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23 at 14:27