Generic trinomial equation $w x^a-x+1=0$
A particular solution such that $x→1$ for $w→0$ is known in analytical form M.L.Glasser, J. Comp. Appl. Math. 118, 169 (2000)
f[a_,w_]:=1+Sum[w^n/n Binomial[a n,n-1],{n,1,∞}]
Example A.1 simple quadratic equation
α=2; x=f[α,w] Simplify[1-x+ w x^α] Out[1]= 1+(1-Sqrt[1-4 w]-2 w)/(2 w) Out[2]= 0
Example A.2 cubic equation
α=3; x=f[α,w] Simplify[1-x+ w x^α] Out[3]= 1+(-3 Sqrt[w]+2 Sqrt[3] Sin[1/3 ArcSin[(3 Sqrt[3] Sqrt[w])/2]])/(3 Sqrt[w]) Out[4]= 0
Trinomial equation of the type $x^α-p x+q=0$
Solution is obtained from a generic formula by simple rescaling
g[a_,p_,q_]:=(q/p) f[a,q^(a-1)/p^a]
Example B.1 general quadratic equation
Clear[α,p,q] p=-2; α=2; x=g[α,p,q] Simplify[x^α-p x+q] Out[5]= -(1/2) (1+(2-2 Sqrt[1-q]-q)/q) q Out[6]= 0
Example B.2 cubic equation
Clear[α,p,q] p=-2; α=3; x=g[α,p,q] Simplify[x^α-p x+q] Out[7]= -(1/2) q (1+(-3 q+4 Sqrt[6] Sinh[1/3 ArcSinh[3/4 Sqrt[3/2] q]])/(3 q)) Out[8]= 0
Example B.3 quintic
Clear[α,p,q] p=-2; α=5; x=g[α,p,q] Series[x^α-p x+q,{q,0,10}]//Normal Out[9]= -(1/2) q HypergeometricPFQ[{1/5,2/5,3/5,4/5},{1/2,3/4,5/4},-((3125 q^4)/8192)] Out[10]= 0
Example B.4 exponent $\frac52$
Clear[α,p,q] p=-2; α=5/2; x=g[α,p,q] N[x^α-p x+q/.q->-1] Out[11]= -(1/2) q (1+1/8 (-8+8 HypergeometricPFQ[{1/5,2/5,3/5,4/5},{1/2,2/3,4/3},-((3125 q^3)/3456)] -I Sqrt[2] q^(3/2) HypergeometricPFQ[{7/10,9/10,11/10,13/10},{7/6,3/2,11/6},-((3125 q^3)/3456)])) Out[12]= 8.32667*10^-17
Trinomial equations is an interesting piece of mathematics. The case of integer exponents is discussed in this post here, the case of arbitrary real exponents is discussed in this post on mathoverflow. They can be summarized as follows:
- Chip Hurst obtains solutions in terms of hypergeometric functions by expanding in series the
Root object. - J.M. arrives at another form in terms of
MeijerG functions by generalizing the method in the Glasser's paper. - Pietro Majer derives a series solution by using the inversion formula for the function $f(x)=x+ax^p+bx^q$ with real exponents $p>1$ and $q>1$.
amathematically is impossible to obtain a symbolic(analytic) solution, because there is a lack of tools in mathematics to solve this equation.Then Mathematica can't solve. $\endgroup$