I am using OptionsPattern and OptionValue to define some switches for my custom function. Here is a minimal example:
t[vars_, expr_, OptionsPattern[{ Experimental`OptimizeExpression, Compile}]] := ( Compile[vars, expr, CompilationOptions -> OptionValue[CompilationOptions], CompilationTarget -> OptionValue[CompilationTarget], Parallelization -> OptionValue[Parallelization], RuntimeAttributes -> OptionValue[RuntimeAttributes], RuntimeOptions -> OptionValue[RuntimeOptions] ] ) t[{x, y}, Sin[x*y]] This produces the errors:
"Options expected (instead of \ OptionValue[{Experimental`OptimizeExpression,Compile},{},\ CompilationOptions]) beyond position 2 in \ Method->{OptionValue[{Experimental`OptimizeExpression,Compile},{},\ CompilationOptions]}. An option must be a rule or a list of rules." "Options expected (instead of \ OptionValue[{Experimental`OptimizeExpression,Compile},{},\ RuntimeOptions]) beyond position 2 in \ Method->{OptionValue[{Experimental`OptimizeExpression,Compile},{},\ RuntimeOptions]}. An option must be a rule or a list of rules" "OptionValue[{Experimental`OptimizeExpression,Compile},{},\ RuntimeAttributes] is not a known runtime attribute and will be \ ignored" and fails to execute with default values passed to the options. OptionValue appears to fail to grab the correct value. (Moreover, Method appears to be being assigned a value even though Compile has no such option, but this could just be internal definitions to Compile)
Assigning explicitly something like
t[{x, y}, Sin[x*y], CompilationOptions -> {"ExpressionOptimization" -> True}] produces similar errors. Why isn't the correct OptionValues being parsed?
