Skip to main content
"on" vs. "in."
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Are the rational points dense inon the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$, i.e. does $S$ contain a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Are the rational points dense in the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$, i.e. does $S$ contain a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Are the rational points dense on the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$, i.e. does $S$ contain a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Qfwfq
  • 23.6k
  • 17
  • 135
  • 235

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. IsAre the rational points dense in the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$ dense in rational points, i.e. does $S$ includecontain a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Is the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$ dense in rational points, i.e. does $S$ include a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Are the rational points dense in the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$, i.e. does $S$ contain a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]
Image link broken; now fixed.
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Is the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$ dense in rational points, i.e. does $S$ include a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference. [Earlier misleading remark removed.]  

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Is the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$ dense in rational points, i.e. does $S$ include a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference. [Earlier misleading remark removed.]

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]

Call a point of $\mathbb{R}^d$ rational if all its $d$ coordinates are rational numbers.

Q1. Is the unit sphere $S :\; x_1^2 +\cdots+ x_d^2 = 1$ dense in rational points, i.e. does $S$ include a dense set of rational points?

This is certainly true for $d=2$, rational points on the unit circle.

Q2. If (as I suspect) the answer to Q1 is Yes, is there a sense in which the rational coordinates are becoming arithmetically more complicated with larger $d$, say in terms of their height?

If $x= a/b$ is a rational number in lowest terms (i.e. gcd$(a,b)=1$), then the height of $x$ is $\max \lbrace |a|,|b| \rbrace$.

This is far from my expertise. No doubt this is known, in which case a pointer would suffice. Thanks!


(Added, *22Mar13*). I just found this reference.  

Klee, Victor, and Stan Wagon. Old and new unsolved problems in plane geometry and number theory. No. 11. Mathematical Association of America, 1996. p.135.


 ![KleeWagonFig10.8][2]
removed deprecated tag 'geometry'
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.3k
  • 5
  • 43
  • 69
Loading
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
deleted 138 characters in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
added 485 characters in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
Added number theory, reflecting responses so far.
Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
added 16 characters in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 153k
  • 36
  • 375
  • 1k
Loading