3

I'm in academia and I think that as a matter of principle, my code should be open source. It's not likely to have a lot of users. It might have none other than myself. I have it published on github, even if it might be just for the convenience of using the github interface.

How do I choose a suitable license for my project?

2
  • 6
    This question is pretty broad. Can you give so more details on your code and what it will be used for? Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 17:45
  • if you consider it a matter of principle that software written in an academic context is free/open, and you don't want a future researcher to unfree it, then a copyleft license would suit you best - GPL3 or AGPL3 Commented Jan 7, 2016 at 16:12

1 Answer 1

7

choose a license is an easy to use site that walks users through the selection process:
http://choosealicense.com/

Quoting from the site, If you really don't want to hold any patent or you just want to hold a simple licence you can go ahead with MIT licence.

The MIT License is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don’t hold you liable.

If you want to hold any rights to your code you can use the Apache Licence.

The Apache License is a permissive license similar to the MIT License, but also provides an express grant of patent rights from contributors to users.

If you think anyone can improve your code and distribute the newly created work, you can select the GPL licence.

The GPL (V2 or V3) is a copyleft license that requires anyone who distributes your code or a derivative work to make the source available under the same terms. V3 is similar to V2, but further restricts use in hardware that forbids software alterations.

There are more licenses available such as Creative Commons etc.

7
  • 3
    While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 17:46
  • not when they're archived by the wayback machine Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 17:47
  • 2
    @albert But that's not a Wayback Machine link. Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 17:52
  • i didn't say it was...doesn't mean its not indexed Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 17:54
  • 1
    The beginning of this answer sounds very much like an advertisement. When you recommend a product or service it's important to disclose or disclaim any conflicts of interest. Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 18:20

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.