Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Shub
  • 359
  • 3
  • 18

My textbook says the absolute refractive index of a medium $$n = \dfrac{c}{v}$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

My textbook says absolute refractive index of a medium $$n = \dfrac{c}{v}$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

My textbook says the absolute refractive index of a medium $$n = \dfrac{c}{v}$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

Definition of the refractive index

My TBtextbook says absolute refractive index of a medium $n = \dfrac{c}{v}$, $$n = \dfrac{c}{v}$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

Definition of refractive index

My TB says absolute refractive index of a medium $n = \dfrac{c}{v}$,

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

Definition of the refractive index

My textbook says absolute refractive index of a medium $$n = \dfrac{c}{v}$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 223.8k
  • 52
  • 640
  • 2.6k

My TB says absolute refractive index of a medium $n = \dfrac{c}{v}$,

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

My TB says absolute refractive index of a medium $n = \dfrac{c}{v}$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

My TB says absolute refractive index of a medium $n = \dfrac{c}{v}$,

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum and $v$ is the speed of light in the medium.

Why hasn't it been chosen the other way round i.e. $n = \dfrac{v}{c}$?

deleted 7 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 1 character in body
Source Link
Shub
  • 359
  • 3
  • 18
Loading
Source Link
Shub
  • 359
  • 3
  • 18
Loading