1
$\begingroup$

I am confused about a derivation for the behaviour of electrons in a conductor with binary collisions, and scattering due to static impurities. The derivation begins as follows:

The distribution function $f(\mathbf r,\mathbf p)$ evolves according to:

$\frac{df}{dt}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\mathbf v\frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf r}+e\mathbf E\frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf p}=I_{imp}\{f\}+St\{f\}$,

where $St$ is the inelastic collision integral and $I_{imp}$ is the elastic collision integral. These take the following forms:

$St\{f_{\mathbf p}\}=-\sum_{\mathbf p_2,\mathbf p_3,\mathbf p_4}\{w(\mathbf p,\mathbf p_2;\mathbf p_3,\mathbf p_4)f_{\mathbf p}f_{\mathbf p_2}(1-f_{\mathbf p_3})(1-f_{\mathbf p_4})+w(\mathbf p_3,\mathbf p_4;\mathbf p,\mathbf p_2)f_{\mathbf p_3}f_{\mathbf p_4}(1-f_{\mathbf p})(1-f_{\mathbf p_2})\}\delta_{\mathbf p+\mathbf p_2-\mathbf p_3-\mathbf p_4}$ (collision of two electrons)

$I_{imp}\{f_{\mathbf p}\}=\sum_{\mathbf p_1}w(\mathbf p,\mathbf p_1)\{f_{\mathbf p_1}(1-f_{\mathbf p})-f_{\mathbf p}(1-f_{\mathbf p_1})\}$ (scattering with impurity)

The next step is to integrate over momentum $\mathbf p$, which gives:

$\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \mathbf j}{\partial \mathbf r}+e\mathbf E\int\frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf p}d\mathbf p=\int I_{imp}\{f\}+St\{f\}\,d\mathbf p$,

from this you should get the continuity equation:

$e\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot\mathbf j=0$

but I don't understand why the last three integrals disappear. Apparently $\int St\{f\}\,d\mathbf p=0$ due to particle conservation, but I don't understand the physical intuition for this. The impurities scattering also disappears, is this also due to particle conservation? Alongside this, I am unsure what happens to $e\mathbf E\int\frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf p}d\mathbf p=e\mathbf E f$ or where the factor of $e$ comes from in the continuity equation.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I have managed to figure out the answers to my questions with reference to Physical Kinetics: Volume 10 Lifshitz and Pitaevsky. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ Collisions should not alter the number of particles, the total energy or the total momentum, therefore: $\int St\{f\} d\mathbf p=0$, $\int \epsilon St\{f\} d\mathbf p=0$, $\int \mathbf p St\{f\} d\mathbf p=0$ respectively. These relations can be deduced in the following way: $\frac{df}{dt}=St\{f\}$, integrate both sides w.r.t. momentum, swap order of derivative and integral, resulting in: $\frac{dn}{dt}=\int St\{f\}d\mathbf p$. Since $n(\mathbf r,t)$ should not change due to collisions, the r.h.s. must be zero. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ The term $e\mathbf E\int d\mathbf p \frac{\partial f}{\partial \mathbf p}$ is zero since you can swap the order of integration: $e\mathbf E\frac{\partial}{\partial\mathbf p}\int fd\mathbf p=e\mathbf E\frac{\partial n(\mathbf r,t)}{\partial\mathbf p}=0$ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21 at 14:39

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.