Skip to main content

Questions tagged [forces]

This tag is for the classical concept of forces, i.e. the quantities causing an acceleration of a body. It expands to the strong/electroweak force only insofar as they act comparable to ‘classical’ forces. Use the [particle-physics] tag for decay channels due to forces and [newtonian-mechanics] or one of the other subtopics of [classical-mechanics] for the dynamics of classical systems.

0 votes
0 answers
57 views

My son is practicing with his high school Science Olympiad team and came across this question: His source includes an answer, without explanation, that the coefficient of friction is $\mu\approx3.3$. ...
MarkP's user avatar
  • 11
3 votes
3 answers
281 views

What kind of wave travels true the string of a tin can telephone? Most places say that its a longitudinal wave, if that's the case then why when the string is tensioned the message gets louder?
kj123's user avatar
  • 39
-2 votes
0 answers
131 views

If a stationary classical electron is hit by an electromagnetic wave, does it move diagonally, since the electric field moves the electron and the magnetic field of the EM wave causes a Lorentz force ...
Elia C.'s user avatar
  • 39
-1 votes
3 answers
138 views

Can the rotation of an object be viewed as the result of two perpendicular forces ('push' and 'pull') that have combined? When I spin a wheel there is a 'push force' at a right angle to the wheel's ...
Mintaka's user avatar
  • 121
-6 votes
0 answers
53 views

If the coefficient of friction were to increase, how would this affect the total travel time? Explain why by referring to both intervals of motion. Use at least one physics representation as part of ...
HP - 10ZZ 781159 Castlebrooke 's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
40 views

Please forgive me if I am being too much stupid. But please can anybody tell me why I am getting two different values of the Tension for the same pendulum. Its not at equilibrium. As it oscillate due ...
ADARSHYODHA314's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
57 views

My Question stems from the following problem: Consider two resting Point Masses, each with mass $m$, which are connected (the connection having no mass). A Force $F$, which is always perpendicular to ...
entiges_Enton's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
617 views

Let us hang a massless spring and pulled it downwards with force $F$. (You may neglect gravitational force or include it within $F$.) Let due to this the spring extended by $x$. Now let me pull the ...
M. Saamin Rahman's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
96 views

The question is not to talk about why kinetic friction is non-conservative, but rather if there is a way that I could show mathematically that the work done by kinetic friction is path-dependent?
Tasd 541's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
43 views

A pulley usually involves a rotating axle to change the direction of tension. However I read in my Textbook that for an ideal pulley, this need not be the case, and you do not need to consider any ...
Tasd 541's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
26 views

For conservative forces the Euler-Lagrange equation is used to find the relevant details about the system. However magnetic forces are not conservative do not perform any work on an moving charged ...
Anant S. Malviya's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
115 views

Hereinafter, the term “fluid” will be used to mean “ideal fluid” (i.e., an incompressible fluid without friction). The fluid flows to the right through a horizontal pipe at a speed $v$. Then Bernoulli'...
Marmajuck's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
87 views

Suppose we have a uniform, massive, flexible, frictionless and non-stretchable rope in space, initially shaped arbitrarily. Each infinitesimal segment of the rope is given the same velocity in the ...
Zehran Bashir's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
82 views

On the left side, my teacher shows the method for finding stress on a small element dx of a rod. He treats the tension as the restoring force. However, my question concerns the diagram on the right ...
akshansh bansal's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
107 views

We know: $$ F = \frac{dp}{dt} $$ and: $$p = mv$$ so by simple calculus, is it correct to write: $$ F = m \frac{dv}{dt} + v \frac{dm}{dt} $$ If not, why not?
USNIS HUI's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
629