Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you only want to use solid state sensors? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ I plan to use the robots in a very harsh environment and the less moving parts the better. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure if we have the same understanding of the term. You propose a 'continuously rotating servo' so you already have large moving parts. And do you really have a 'very harsh environment', or do you only simulate one? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2019 at 8:53
  • $\begingroup$ I can make it work now, but the plan is for a lunar rover. I want to replace the rotating part with a solid state one since it's a critical part and probable source of failure. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2019 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ You can go low tech with IR emitters and retroflective tape with IR sensors. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2019 at 13:29