768

I follow a development process where I create a new local branch for every new feature or story card. When finished I merge the branch into master and then push.

What tends to happen over time due to a combination of laziness or forgetfulness, is that I end up with a large list of local branches, some of which (such as spikes) may not have been merged.

I know how to list all my local branches and I know how to remove a single branch but I was wondering if there was a Git command that allows me to delete all my local branches?

Below is the output of the git branch --merged command.

cd ~/projects/application git branch --merged 

Output:

 STORY-123-Short-Description STORY-456-Another-Description STORY-789-Blah-Blah * master 

All attempts to delete branches listed with grep -v \* (as per the answers below) result in errors:

error: branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found. error: branch 'STORY-456-Another-Description' not found. error: branch 'STORY-789-Blah-Blah' not found. 

I'm using:

4
  • Not an answer but one thing to call out, that I often do, is when I reach peak laziness and the local clone is very dirty I simply rm -rf /my_cool_repo and reclone the repo. If I do not have an active branch that is the easiest way to "clean out all local branches" IMO. Clearly not the answer if you are actively doing work on a branch. Commented Mar 12, 2021 at 16:27
  • 1
    @theJones I wouldn't recommend re-cloning as you'd lose any changes in unversioned and ignored files e.g. IDE projects. The most popular answer below has perfectly worked for me for years. Commented May 6, 2021 at 14:20
  • @louth could you consider to change the accepted answer in order to keep a valid solution ? the current one is no longer working Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 17:46
  • git branch | xargs git branch -D this command works for me Commented Sep 30 at 9:13

38 Answers 38

869

The 'git branch -d' subcommand can delete more than one branch. So, simplifying @sblom's answer but adding a critical xargs:

git branch -D `git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs` 

or, further simplified to:

git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D 

Importantly, as noted by @AndrewC, using git branch for scripting is discouraged. To avoid it use something like:

git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads | grep -v "master\|main" | xargs git branch -D 

Caution warranted on deletes!

$ mkdir br $ cd br; git init Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/ebg/test/br/.git/ $ touch README; git add README; git commit -m 'First commit' [master (root-commit) 1d738b5] First commit 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 README $ git branch Story-123-a $ git branch Story-123-b $ git branch Story-123-c $ git branch --merged Story-123-a Story-123-b Story-123-c * master $ git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs Story-123-a Story-123-b Story-123-c $ git branch --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D Deleted branch Story-123-a (was 1d738b5). Deleted branch Story-123-b (was 1d738b5). Deleted branch Story-123-c (was 1d738b5). 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

17 Comments

This command still reports the same errors as mentioned in the comments for the answer below. error:branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found. for each of the branches listed.
So, did using git 1.7.10 solve your problem or do you prefer working directly in the .git repository?
If you get a error:branch 'STORY-123-Short-Description' not found. error, this is probably due to the git color settings. This worked for me (note the --no-color option): git branch --no-color --merged | grep -v \* | xargs git branch -D
After a long time, I'm here to share another solution for Node.js developers. github.com/jmlavoier/clear-branches npx clear-branches.
Did not work for me. Got the following error: fatal: branch name required
|
700

The simpler way to delete all branches but keeping others like "develop" and "master" is the following:

git branch | grep -v "develop" | grep -v "master" | grep -v "main" | xargs git branch -D 

On Windows machines (PowerShell):

git branch | %{ $_.Trim() } | ?{ $_ -ne 'master' } | ?{ $_ -ne 'main'} | ?{ $_ -ne 'develop'} | %{ git branch -D $_ } 

It is very useful!

13 Comments

This answer is clear in piping output from git branch, modifying it, and passing to git branch -D. No need to be mean.
This solution worked for me. Deleted all local branches.
This will not delete any branch contains word develop or master like 'develop_feature' or 'master_feature'.
I completely disagree with Andrew C's comment, I am here in 2022 and the solution worked perfectly for me. Thanks geoom
Run this ps script for windows: git branch | %{ $_.Trim() } | ?{ $_ -ne 'master' } | ?{ $_ -ne 'release'} | %{ git branch -D $_ } Skips master and release branches
|
200

I found a nicer way in a comment on this issue on GitHub:

git branch --merged master --no-color | grep -v "master\|stable\|main" | xargs git branch -d 

This includes the no-color option and excluding of the stable branch (add other branches as needed in your case).

9 Comments

I've tried this but keep getting error: branch 'my-branch-name' not found. for every branch. Using git version 1.8.3.4 (Apple Git-47). Any idea why?
try 'git branch --merged master | grep -v master | xargs echo' to debug what exactly it is trying to delete? have no better ideas...
It's something to do with special characters added as part of colour coding. trying all sorts of sed variations to get rid of them
So. git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads/ | grep -v master | xargs git branch -d
If you are reading this in 2021. It is likely that you'll encounter fatal: malformed object name master, fatal: branch name required. This is because a lot of github projects don't have a master branch anymore. They often use main instead. In this case, replace the git branch --merged master by git branch --merged main.
|
185
+50

Parsing the output of git branch is not recommended, and not a good answer for future readers on Stack Overflow.

  1. git branch is what is known as a porcelain command. Porcelain commands are not designed to be machine parsed and the output may change between different versions of Git.
  2. There are user configuration options that change the output of git branch in a way that makes it difficult to parse (for instance, colorization). If a user has set color.branch then you will get control codes in the output, this will lead to error: branch 'foo' not found. if you attempt to pipe it into another command. You can bypass this with the --no-color flag to git branch, but who knows what other user configurations might break things.
  3. git branch may do other things that are annoying to parse, like put an asterisk next to the currently checked out branch

The maintainer of git has this to say about scripting around git branch output

To find out what the current branch is, casual/careless users may have scripted around git branch, which is wrong. We actively discourage against use of any Porcelain command, including git branch, in scripts, because the output from the command is subject to change to help human consumption use case.

Answers that suggest manually editing files in the .git directory (like .git/refs/heads) are similarly problematic (refs may be in .git/packed-refs instead, or Git may change their internal layout in the future).

Git provides the for-each-ref command to retrieve a list of branches.

Git 2.7.X will introduce the --merged option to so you could do something like the below to find and delete all branches merged into HEAD

for mergedBranch in $(git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' --merged HEAD refs/heads/) do git branch -d ${mergedBranch} done 

Git 2.6.X and older, you will need to list all local branches and then test them individually to see if they have been merged (which will be significantly slower and slightly more complicated).

for branch in $(git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads/) do git merge-base --is-ancestor ${branch} HEAD && git branch -d ${branch} done 

13 Comments

git branch --no-color 2>/dev/null?
It's an improvement for sure. You will always have the problem of needing to filter out the *, and it does amusing things if somebody runs it from detached head. The main problem though is git branch is a porcelain command, and there is no guarantee that the output won't change in some future version of git.
Thank you @AndrewC - this is both answers the question bout the mysterious "branch not found" errors and provides a working solution using a more appropriate command! 👍
How are 'Porcelain' and 'non-Porcelain' GIT commands identified?
Probably would be a useful enhancement to exclude 'dev' and 'master' by default?
|
151

Try the following shell command:

git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D 

Explanation:

  • Get all branches (except for the master) via git branch | grep -v "master" command
  • Select every branch with xargs command
  • Delete branch with xargs git branch -D

5 Comments

Although this may be a correct answer. One line of code isn't very useful without an explanation of what and how it solves the original question. Please provide details to your answer.
How to delete all other branches except master and some other branch say branchA using this one line command? Currently I do git branch | grep -v "master" | grep -v "branchA" | xargs git branch -D
I would also put a git checkout master in front: git checkout master; git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D
Why do I get errors like these? error: branch '<branch-name>' not found. These branches exist on local that's why it is trying to find them...
add "--force" at the end if you really mean it.
76

The below command will delete all the local branches except master branch.

git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D 

The above command

  1. list all the branches
  2. From the list ignore the master branch and take the rest of the branches
  3. delete the branch

3 Comments

I would use git branch | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -d first so I don't delete unmerged branches, just to be safe. But nice answer!
Here is a powershell version ,@(git branch | Select-String -Pattern "[^(*?)\s? master]") | ForEach-Object{$_.Line.Trim()} | %{git branch -D $_}
@baklazan this would only work in Windows 10 command line if you have some tools installed. You probably have MINGW or some other such thing and you don't know it.
72

To delete every branch except the one that you currently have checked out:

for b in `git branch --merged | grep -v \*`; do git branch -D $b; done 

I would recommend changing git branch -D $b to an echo $b the first few times to make sure that it deletes the branches that you intend.

6 Comments

with this command I get error:branch 'a_branch_name' not found. I can see what you're trying to do and I've been playing around with the command but for some reason git doesn't seem to like the branch names supplied...
hmmm. to help troubleshoot, it would be useful to see some example output from git branch --merged
my branch names are of the format STORY-123-Short-Description
and when you run git branch --merged, you get a list with one of those on each line?
does it literally say error:branch 'a_branch_name' not found.? Or does it complain about one of the branch names from your git branch output above?
|
55

To delete all local branches in linux except the one you are on

// hard delete git branch -D $(git branch) 

3 Comments

This one feels safer than going into .git and removing stuff.
This command very useful
Works in all, linux, mac windows just use git bash instead of powershell
43

Just a note; I would upgrade to Git 1.7.10. You may be getting answers here that won't work on your version. My guess is that you would have to prefix the branch name with refs/heads/.

Caution: Proceed with the following only if you made a copy of your working folder and .git directory.

I sometimes just go ahead and delete the branches I don't want straight from .git/refs/heads. All these branches are text files that contain the 40 character SHA-1 hash value of the commit they point to. You will have extraneous information in your .git/config file if you had specific tracking set up for any of them. You can delete those entries manually as well.

3 Comments

This will not work if you have packed refs, or even if you cloned from a remote server sometimes (which will provide you packed files). If you refs are packed, then the refs will not be stored in .git/refs/heads, they will be stored in a file called "packed-refs". See git-scm.com/docs/git-pack-refs.
It seems like a bad idea to remove the branch you have checked out at the moment
@Moberg Just checkout a commit beforehand, and your detached HEAD will float all right.
43

First (switch to the branch you want to keep > for example: 'master'):

git checkout master 

Second (make sure you are on 'master')

git branch -D $(git branch) 

If you're using PowerShell, use:

git branch -D $(git branch).Trim() 

2 Comments

git branch -D $(git branch) works just as I want. Thanks!
Additionally run git fetch --prune to delete any ghost remote branches from terminal and as well vscode history
30

I found it easier to just use a text editor and the shell.

  1. Type git checkout <TAB> in the shell. It will show all local branches.
  2. Copy them to a text editor, and remove those you need to keep.
  3. Replace line breaks with spaces. (In Sublime Text, it's super easy.)
  4. Open the shell, and type git branch -D <PASTE THE BRANCHES NAMES HERE>.

That's it.

2 Comments

I don't think you can remove the branch which you are stand on.
@Dong There's a * beside that branch so you just remove it from the copied list!
27

To remove all your local Git branches, but keep main:

git branch | grep -v "main" | xargs git branch -D 

1 Comment

One slight problem with this is that if you are currently on one of the non-main branches you will get an asterisk in the list of branches to delete.
21

From Windows Command Line, delete all except the current checked out branch using:

for /f "tokens=*" %f in ('git branch ^| find /v "*"') do git branch -D %f 

3 Comments

on windows 10, when I put this in a .bat or .cmd file, it says: f was unexpected at this time. Do, I need to change something about the %f parameters ?
From a .cmd file, you need to replace %f with %%f
Just for reference, this will delete all branches containing "chore": for /f "tokens=*" %f in ('git branch ^| find "chore"') do git branch -D %f
20

If you want to delete all your local branches, here is the simple command:

git branch -D `git branch` 

Note: This will delete all the branches except the current checked out branch

Comments

19

Delete All Local Branches in Local


Use this as this is pretty simple. This will delete all the branches on your computer and not on remote repository.

 git branch -D $(git branch) 

3 Comments

FYI this only works in Linux on Windows see stackoverflow.com/a/74024258/3782963
Worked perfectly on mac. Nice and simple. Thanks.
Just a note, -D deletes all non merged to main branches too. try git branch -d $(git branch)
17

Here's the PowerShell solution for anyone running on a Windows machine:

git checkout master # By being on the 'master' branch, # you won't be able to delete it foreach($branch in (git branch)) { git branch -D $branch.Trim() } 

1 Comment

I remove all my features with foreach($branch in (git branch)) { if ($branch.trim().startswith("feature")) {git branch -D $branch.trim()} }. Thank you :)
17

If you work with NodeJS, I wrote this command:

npx git-clear-branch 

The command clears all of your local branch except master, main and current branch.

Comments

16

I had a similar kind of situation and recently found the following command useful.

git branch -D `git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep>/) printf "%s", $0 }'` 

If you want to keep multiple branches, then

git branch -D `git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep1>|<Branch_You_Want_to_Keep2>/) printf "%s", $0 }'` 

1 Comment

Nice one but I needed backticks to get it to work git branch -D `git branch | awk '{ if ($0 !~ /master/) printf "%s", $0 }'` --Actually I think you did have them originally but they got lost in the SO formatting.
11

Use:

git branch -l | grep -v master | xargs git branch -D 

But what care deleting the branch; just remove the workspace and reclone it if it is a small repository!!

Comments

9

Although this isn't a command line solution, I'm surprised the Git GUI hasn't been suggested yet.

I use the command line 99% of the time, but in this case its either far to slow (hence the original question), or you don't know what you are about to delete when resorting to some lengthy, but clever shell manipulation.

The UI solves this issue since you can quickly check off the branches you want removed, and be reminded of ones you want to keep, without having to type a command for every branch.

From the UI go to Branch --> Delete and Ctrl+Click the branches you want to delete so they are highlighted. If you want to be sure they are merged into a branch (such as dev), under Delete Only if Merged Into set Local Branch to dev. Otherwise, set it to Always to ignore this check.

GitUI: delete local branches

Comments

9

If you want to keep master, develop and all remote branches, delete all local branches which are not present on GitHub any more.

git fetch --prune git branch | grep -v "origin" | grep -v "develop" | grep -v "master" | xargs git branch -D 
  1. It will delete remote refs that aren't in use any longer on the remote repository.

  2. This will get list of all your branches. Remove branch containing master, develop or origin (remote branches) from the list. Delete all branches in list.

Warning: This deletes your own local branches as well. So do this when you have merged your branch and doing a cleanup after merge: delete.

Comments

7

If you don't need to go through Git itself, you can also delete heads under .git/refs/heads manually or programmatically. The following should work with minimal tweaking under Bash:

shopt -s extglob rm -rf .git/refs/heads/!(master) 

This will delete every local branch except your master branch. Since your upstream branches are stored under .git/refs/remotes, they will remain untouched.

If you are not using Bash, or want to recurse a lot of Git repositories at once, you can do something similar with GNU find:

find . \ -path remotes -path logs -prune -o \ -wholename \*.git/refs/heads/\* \! -name master -print0 | xargs -0 rm -rf 

The find solution is probably more portable, but pruning paths and filenames is tricky and potentially more error-prone.

Comments

7

None of the answers satisfied my needs fully, so here we go:

git branch --merged | grep -E "(feature|bugfix|hotfix)/" | xargs git branch -D && git remote prune origin 

This will delete all local branches which are merged and starting with feature/, bugfix/ or hotfix/. Afterwards the upstream remote origin is pruned (you may have to enter a password).

Works on Git 1.9.5.

Comments

6

Based on a combination of a number of answers here - if you want to keep all branches that exist on remote but delete the rest, the following oneliner will do the trick:

git for-each-ref --format '%(refname:short)' refs/heads | grep -Ev `git ls-remote --quiet --heads origin | awk '{print substr($2, 12)}'| paste -sd "|" -` | xargs git branch -D 

Comments

6
git for-each-ref \ --format="%(if) %(HEAD) %(then) %(else) %(refname:short) %(end)" \ refs/heads/ | xargs -r git branch -D 

This:

  1. Doesn't use a porcelain git branch
  2. Uses the official (from git-for-each-ref help page) way of identifying the current branch

Parts:

  1. git for-each-ref --format="..." refs/heads/ finds all branches that are not the current branch
    • %(HEAD) finds if the branch is the current branch so "%(if) %(HEAD) %(then) %(else) %(refname:short) %(end) prints an empty line for the current branch. From help:
      • We ignore space when evaluating the string before %(then), this is useful when we use the %(HEAD) atom which prints either "*" or " " and we want to apply the if condition only on the HEAD ref.

    • %(refname:short) -from help:
      • For a non-ambiguous short name of the ref append :short.

  2. xargs -r git branch -D deletes the branch
    • -r, or --no-run-if-empty, makes the xarg ignore the empty line for the current branch

Comments

4

git branch -d [branch name] for local delete

git branch -D [branch name] also for local delete but forces it

Comments

4

Deleting many local branches at once

# delete all local unmerged branches git branch --no-merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -D # delete all local branches (merged and unmerged). git branch | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -D 

Deleting remote branches

# Deleting non-existent tracking branches git remote prune <remote> --dry-run # Deleting a single remote branch git push <remote> --delete <branch> # Deleting many remote branches at once git branch -r --merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | sed 's/origin\///' | xargs -n 1 git push origin --delete 

Source

Comments

3

If you are using windows, try this in powershell

git branch | Select-String -notmatch "master" | ForEach-Object {$_.ToString().Trim()} | ForEach-Object {git branch -D $_} 

Comments

3

I don't have grep or other Unix commands on my box, but this worked from Visual Studio Code's terminal:

git branch -d $(git branch).trim()

I use the lowercase d, so it won't delete unmerged branches.

I was also on master when I did it, so * master doesn't exist, so it didn't attempt deleting master.

1 Comment

Confirmed: If not on master, this command WILL delete master.
3

I recommend a more moderate answer. Many of the answers here use -D which is forced delete regardless of whether changes have been merged or not. Here is a one-liner which leaves untouched the branches which have unmerged changes.

git branch --merged | egrep -v "(^\*|master|dev)" | xargs git branch -d 

Or you can try other examples listed, but just change the -D to -d. I know the OP asked how to delete, but in most use cases, it’s safer to use -d.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.