5

Possible Duplicate:
What is the difference between scala self-types and trait subclasses?

I understand a self-annotation as a promise to the compiler, where the programmer manifests that a trait will be mixin with the annotated one. For example:

scala> trait X defined trait X scala> trait Y { this: X => } defined trait Y scala> new Y {} <console>:10: error: illegal inheritance; self-type Y does not conform to Y's selftype Y with X new Y {} ^ scala> new Y with X {} res1: Y with X = $anon$1@1125a40 

In the previous example, the third expression failed because we did not set a valid X to the new instance. Obviously, the last one works nice. So far, so good. And now, let's see another example which involves an object.

scala> object Z { this: X => } defined module Z 

I understand the object is being instantiated failing with the X promise (we are creating an instance now with a future promise!), as represented in the next lines, where the traits have been slightly modified:

scala> trait X { class X1 } defined trait X scala> trait Y { this: X => new X1 } defined trait Y scala> object Z { this: X => new X1 } <console>:8: error: not found: type X1 object Z { this: X => new X1 } ^ 

So, what does the object self-annotation imply?

0

1 Answer 1

3

In fact, you can do the same thing with classes - add a self-type which is not inherited, but you won't be able to instantiate such a class.

Allowing singleton objects to have self types does not invalidate programs in any way - you simply won't be able to call any of the methods of the self-type (or instantiate its inner classes) from within the singleton object, because it didn't inherit the self-type.

Nevertheless, it may be a bug, you may wish to file a bug.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

4 Comments

I think that in the class case, for example: "class A { this: X => new X1 }" you can play with "new A with X", so it has sense, but I cannot find any situation where one could need the self annotation in an object.
True, for objects and final classes, it makes no sense that I can see.
Mind you, I think objects can actually be overridden if they are members of a trait or class.
Can they - aren't they final members? pastebin.com/yvNU9QrB

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.