32

The task I try to accomplish is to stream a ruby file and print out the output. (NOTE: I don't want to print out everything at once)

main.py

from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT import pty import os file_path = '/Users/luciano/Desktop/ruby_sleep.rb' command = ' '.join(["ruby", file_path]) master, slave = pty.openpty() proc = Popen(command, bufsize=0, shell=True, stdout=slave, stderr=slave, close_fds=True) stdout = os.fdopen(master, 'r', 0) while proc.poll() is None: data = stdout.readline() if data != "": print(data) else: break print("This is never reached!") 

ruby_sleep.rb

puts "hello" sleep 2 puts "goodbye!" 

Problem

Streaming the file works fine. The hello/goodbye output is printed with the 2 seconds delay. Exactly as the script should work. The problem is that readline() hangs in the end and never quits. I never reach the last print.

I know there is a lot of questions like this here a stackoverflow but non of them made me solve the problem. I'm not that into the whole subprocess thing so please give me a more hands-on/concrete answer.

Regards

edit

Fix unintended code. (nothing to do with the actual error)

3
  • Not sure if you have a typo when pasting code into your question, or if the problem is genuine. Looks to me like the if should be indented so that it is inside the loop. Commented Sep 14, 2012 at 6:38
  • Thanks for noticing. It's a typo from when I pasted the code. It's fixed now. Sorry about that. Commented Sep 14, 2012 at 8:26
  • I'm not sure, but isn't your problem very similar to the one in stackoverflow.com/questions/8495794/… ? Commented Sep 17, 2012 at 14:22

4 Answers 4

39
+50

I assume you use pty due to reasons outlined in Q: Why not just use a pipe (popen())? (all other answers so far ignore your "NOTE: I don't want to print out everything at once").

pty is Linux only as said in the docs:

Because pseudo-terminal handling is highly platform dependent, there is code to do it only for Linux. (The Linux code is supposed to work on other platforms, but hasn’t been tested yet.)

It is unclear how well it works on other OSes.

You could try pexpect:

import sys import pexpect pexpect.run("ruby ruby_sleep.rb", logfile=sys.stdout) 

Or stdbuf to enable line-buffering in non-interactive mode:

from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT proc = Popen(['stdbuf', '-oL', 'ruby', 'ruby_sleep.rb'], bufsize=1, stdout=PIPE, stderr=STDOUT, close_fds=True) for line in iter(proc.stdout.readline, b''): print line, proc.stdout.close() proc.wait() 

Or using pty from stdlib based on @Antti Haapala's answer:

#!/usr/bin/env python import errno import os import pty from subprocess import Popen, STDOUT master_fd, slave_fd = pty.openpty() # provide tty to enable # line-buffering on ruby's side proc = Popen(['ruby', 'ruby_sleep.rb'], stdin=slave_fd, stdout=slave_fd, stderr=STDOUT, close_fds=True) os.close(slave_fd) try: while 1: try: data = os.read(master_fd, 512) except OSError as e: if e.errno != errno.EIO: raise break # EIO means EOF on some systems else: if not data: # EOF break print('got ' + repr(data)) finally: os.close(master_fd) if proc.poll() is None: proc.kill() proc.wait() print("This is reached!") 

All three code examples print 'hello' immediately (as soon as the first EOL is seen).


leave the old more complicated code example here because it may be referenced and discussed in other posts on SO

Or using pty based on @Antti Haapala's answer:

import os import pty import select from subprocess import Popen, STDOUT master_fd, slave_fd = pty.openpty() # provide tty to enable # line-buffering on ruby's side proc = Popen(['ruby', 'ruby_sleep.rb'], stdout=slave_fd, stderr=STDOUT, close_fds=True) timeout = .04 # seconds while 1: ready, _, _ = select.select([master_fd], [], [], timeout) if ready: data = os.read(master_fd, 512) if not data: break print("got " + repr(data)) elif proc.poll() is not None: # select timeout assert not select.select([master_fd], [], [], 0)[0] # detect race condition break # proc exited os.close(slave_fd) # can't do it sooner: it leads to errno.EIO error os.close(master_fd) proc.wait() print("This is reached!") 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

7 Comments

What's the reason for the if not data: break here? wouldn't that case be caught by the proc.poll() is not None in the next while iteration?
The reason to ask is for this (related) answer: stackoverflow.com/a/52954716/1240268
@AndyHayden ignore the last code example. It is here for historical reasons (read the comment before the code). p.poll() is not used to break the loop in the new code (with while 1 loop). Related Python subprocess .check_call vs .check_output
@AndyHayden about the answer you link: avoid multiple ptys, see caveats and the link at the end of the answer which uses 2 ptys
@jfs: Is there anything wrong with the last code example other than it being more complicated? It seems like a useful option for addressing Andy Hayden's problem since we need something like select.select there to distinguish stdout from stderr. The other code examples above do not provide that ability (which we need since in general we wouldn't know which of the two to read from first).
|
5

Not sure what is wrong with your code, but the following seems to work for me:

#!/usr/bin/python from subprocess import Popen, PIPE import threading p = Popen('ls', stdout=PIPE) class ReaderThread(threading.Thread): def __init__(self, stream): threading.Thread.__init__(self) self.stream = stream def run(self): while True: line = self.stream.readline() if len(line) == 0: break print line, reader = ReaderThread(p.stdout) reader.start() # Wait until subprocess is done p.wait() # Wait until we've processed all output reader.join() print "Done!" 

Note that I don't have Ruby installed and hence cannot check with your actual problem. Works fine with ls, though.

1 Comment

Using if len(line): was peace which helps me. using only if line: doesn't work on python3.
2

Basically what you are looking at here is a race condition between your proc.poll() and your readline(). Since the input on the master filehandle is never closed, if the process attempts to do a readline() on it after the ruby process has finished outputting, there will never be anything to read, but the pipe will never close. The code will only work if the shell process closes before your code tries another readline().

Here is the timeline:

readline() print-output poll() readline() print-output (last line of real output) poll() (returns false since process is not done) readline() (waits for more output) (process is done, but output pipe still open and no poll ever happens for it). 

Easy fix is to just use the subprocess module as it suggests in the docs, not in conjunction with openpty:

http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html

Here is a very similar problem for further study:

Using subprocess with select and pty hangs when capturing output

4 Comments

However, the code also hangs when not using pty, but using readline.
But it is using readline on a fd that is part of a pty. That is why readline is hanging. If the output pipe was closed it would return EOF and readline would return "". As it is the output pipe is still open, but no process is providing any input, so it isn't providing any output.
No I rewrote the code, so as not to use a pty. It still hangs in readline. It is only when I removed readline that the code worked.
+1 for the last link. It is not clear what you mean by "just use the subprocess module as it suggests in the docs, not in conjunction with openpty" but it probably won't work due to block-buffering on ruby's side. See my answer
1

Try this:

proc = Popen(command, bufsize=0, shell=True, stdout=PIPE, close_fds=True) for line in proc.stdout: print line print("This is most certainly reached!") 

As others have noted, readline() will block when reading data. It will even do so when your child process has died. I am not sure why this does not happen when executing ls as in the other answer, but maybe the ruby interpreter detects that it is writing to a PIPE and therefore it will not close automatically.

1 Comment

this won't show hello before the child dies due to block-buffering. .readline() in your case returns '' when the child dies (try it with iter(proc.stdout.readline, b'')).

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.