Exception not getting caught in catch block

Question

I have a function with try, catch and finally block. If an exception is caught, then I catch certain parameters of that exception such as its error code, error detail message and message and print it in an excel file. Am posting relevant code below:

 public void UpdateGroup(String strSiteID, String strGroup, int row) { try { Console.WriteLine("UpdateGroup"); Excel1.MWMClient.MWMServiceProxy.Group group = new Excel1.MWMClient.MWMServiceProxy.Group(); group.name = "plumber"; group.description = "he is a plumber"; Console.WriteLine(groupClient.UpdateGroup(strSiteID,group)); ExcelRecorder(0, null, null, row); } catch (System.ServiceModel.FaultException<DefaultFaultContract> ex) { ExcelRecorder(ex.Detail.ErrorCode, ex.Detail.Message, ex.Message, row); } finally { System.GC.Collect(); } } public void ExcelRecorder(int error, string detailmessage, string message, int row) { Excel.Application xlApp = new Excel.Application(); Excel.Workbook xlWorkbook = xlApp.Workbooks.Open(@"D:/WebServiceTestCases_Output.xlsx"); Excel._Worksheet xlWorksheet = xlWorkbook.Sheets[1]; Excel.Range xlRange = xlWorksheet.UsedRange; if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(message)) { ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "M"]).Value2 = "FAIL"; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "N"]).Value2 = error; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "O"]).Value2 = detailmessage; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "P"]).Value2 = message; } else { ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "M"]).Value2 = "PASS"; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "N"]).Value2 = ""; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "O"]).Value2 = ""; ((Range)xlWorksheet.Cells[row, "P"]).Value2 = ""; } xlWorkbook.Save(); xlWorkbook.Close(0,0,0); xlApp.Quit(); }

The problem is, earlier I was having a piece of code like

catch(Exception ex) { ExcelRecorder(ex.Message); }

At that time, all exceptions was getting caught. But, later the requirement got changed as I needed to capture error detail code and error detail message also. So, I changed my catch block with catch (System.ServiceModel.FaultException ex) as it allowed me to fetch those paramaters. But now, certain exceptions are not getting caught in the catch block. How can i change my catch block so that I can catch all exceptions?

Well you can have multiple catch blocks.

V4Vendetta
– V4Vendetta

2012-09-26 07:02:56 +00:00
Commented Sep 26, 2012 at 7:02 — V4Vendetta
– V4Vendetta, Commented Sep 26, 2012 at 7:02

Marc Gravell · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:05:07Z

There are basically two ways:

1: two catch blocks (most specific first):

catch (System.ServiceModel.FaultException<DefaultFaultContract> ex) { ExcelRecorder(ex.Detail.ErrorCode, ex.Detail.Message, ex.Message, row); } catch (Exception ex) { // TODO: simpler error handler }

2: one catch block with a test:

catch (Exception ex) { var fault = ex as System.ServiceModel.FaultException<DefaultFaultContract>; if(fault != null) { ExcelRecorder(fault.Detail.ErrorCode, fault.Detail.Message, fault.Message, row); } // TODO: common error handling steps }

Either can work. The first is perhaps cleaner, but if you want to do a lot of common things inside the catch the second might have advantages.

BugFinder · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:04:18Z

Add another catch area.. You can have multiple

try { // stuff } catch (Exception1 ex} { // 1 type of exception } catch (Exception e) // catch whats left }

Prabhu Murthy · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:46:37Z

System.Exception is the mother of all exception types.So when you have it,will catch any kind of exception.
But when you know a specific exception is possible in your code and have a catch block with that exception type as parameter,then that block gets a higher priority over System.Exception

Zdeslav Vojkovic · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:04:27Z

You can do one of the following:

provide separate catch block for each exception you are interested in
use catch Exception ex to catch all and pick only those you are interested in
catch the base exception class of the family of exceptions you are interested in, if there is such base class (but usually there isn't)

In general, you either catch all exceptions (option 2), or only those that you really know how to handle (option 1)

V4Vendetta · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:06:49Z

So from what you mentioned it seems like you have

try{} catch(FaultException ex){ExcelRecorder(ex.Message,[other params]);}

Now you can have one more catch block for all other exceptions like

catch(Exception all){// you may log}

so when a different exception arises it would not be handled by the FaultException catch but instead move into the generic exception block and you can choose to process it as you need

manas · Accepted Answer · 2012-09-26 07:16:03Z

Have as much catch blocks, for each of the expected exceptions. Dont forget to catch the most specific ones on top. Finally catch the Exception class to catch any of the remaining exceptions.

If you catch the Exception on top, for any exception, this block will fire and all other blocks will be unreachable.

try { // your code here } catch (FirstSpecificException ex) { } catch (SecondSpecificException ex) { } catch (NthSpecificExceptoin ex) { } catch (Exception ex) { // in case you might have missed anything specifc. }

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Exception not getting caught in catch block

6 Answers 6

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

6 Answers 6

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Linked

Related