134

Consider the following code:

class Base(object): @classmethod def do(cls, a): print cls, a class Derived(Base): @classmethod def do(cls, a): print 'In derived!' # Base.do(cls, a) -- can't pass `cls` Base.do(a) if __name__ == '__main__': d = Derived() d.do('hello') > $ python play.py > In derived! > <class '__main__.Base'> msg

From Derived.do, how do I call Base.do?

I would normally use super or even the base class name directly if this is a normal object method, but apparently I can't find a way to call the classmethod in the base class.

In the above example, Base.do(a) prints Base class instead of Derived class.

Improve this question
1

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
150

If you're using a new-style class (i.e. derives from object in Python 2, or always in Python 3), you can do it with super() like this:

super(Derived, cls).do(a)

This is how you would invoke the code in the base class's version of the method (i.e. print cls, a), from the derived class, with cls being set to the derived class.

Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

uh uh .. how come it never occured to me that I can use super on classmethods too.
this only works (due to a limitation imposed by super) if the base derives from object, right? what do you do if that's not the case?
Yeah, this only works for new-style classes, which derive from object. (at least in Python 2, but in Py3 I think all classes are new-style, IIRC) Otherwise you have to do Base.do(self, ...), I think, thereby hard-coding the name of the superclass.
Inside Derived.do(), isn't cls the same as Derived?
@Ray If it is actually an instance of Derived but not of a subclass, then yes.
17

this has been a while, but I think I may have found an answer. When you decorate a method to become a classmethod the original unbound method is stored in a property named 'im_func':

class Base(object): @classmethod def do(cls, a): print cls, a class Derived(Base): @classmethod def do(cls, a): print 'In derived!' # Base.do(cls, a) -- can't pass `cls` Base.do.im_func(cls, a) if __name__ == '__main__': d = Derived() d.do('hello')
Improve this answer

2 Comments

Note: This approach works for old style classes where super() doesn't work
Also available as __func__ in python 2.7 and 3
5

Building on the answer from @David Z using:

super(Derived, cls).do(a)

Which can be further simplified to:

super(cls, cls).do(a)

I often use classmethods to provide alternative ways to construct my objects. In the example below I use the super functions as above for the class method load that alters the way that the objects are created:

class Base(): def __init__(self,a): self.a = a @classmethod def load(cls,a): return cls(a=a) class SubBase(Base): @classmethod def load(cls,b): a = b-1 return super(cls,cls).load(a=a) base = Base.load(a=1) print(base) print(base.a) sub = SubBase.load(b=3) print(sub) print(sub.a)

Output:

<__main__.Base object at 0x128E48B0> 1 <__main__.SubBase object at 0x128E4710> 2
Improve this answer

3 Comments

Replacing super(Derived, cls).do(a) with super(cls, cls).do(a) is not a good way. It will not work (it actually will cause an exception) when you have another class SubSubBase(SubBase) without load() method defined and you will try to use it.
@MartinGrůber: so what is the correct way in Python3? Simply super().load(...) will work correctly for classmethods?
@MestreLion Not sure what is the correct way but I would stay with super(Derived, cls).do(a) which works AFAIK.
-4

This works for me:

Base.do('hi')
Improve this answer

2 Comments

The cls argument will then be bound to Base instead of Derived
what works for me is this - which looks (a lot) like Ned's answer: where self derives from QGraphicsView which has paintEvent(QPaintEvent) def paintEvent (self, qpntEvent): print dir(self) QGraphicsView.paintEvent(self, qpntEvent)

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.