Java generics question

Question

Is it possible to write a method that could create instances of any specified type?

I think java generics should help, so it might be something like this:

 public <U> U getObject(Class klass){ //... }

Could anyone help me?

Peter Štibraný · Accepted Answer · 2009-09-19 13:18:01Z

9

public <U> U getObject(Class<U> klass) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException { return klass.newInstance(); }

There are few `problems' with this method though:

class must have constructor with no arguments
if constructor throws any checked exception, it will be propagated even though your getObject method doesn't declare it in throws part.

See Class.newInstance() documentation for details.

edited Sep 19, 2009 at 13:18

answered Sep 19, 2009 at 13:12

Peter Štibraný

33k16 gold badges92 silver badges118 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

akf Over a year ago

The Class class was implemented with Generics, so there really is no need to wrap its own Generic newInstance() in another method.

Peter Štibraný Over a year ago

Yes, I agree. I just filled 'template' from question.

alphazero Over a year ago

Those are not problems; it is what it is. You have given the precise answer to the question. Add overloaded method getObject(Class<U> clazz, Object...args) and it is done.

Carl · Accepted Answer · 2009-09-19 13:29:52Z

 public <U> U genericFactory(Constructor<U> classConstructor, Object..args) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException, IllegalArgumentException, InvocationTargetException { return classConstructor.newInstance(args); }

You can get a constructor from a Class<U> object via the getConstructors method. Via the constructor itself you can get information about the arguments, so there needs to be some extra code outside this factory to fill in the arguments appropriately.

Obviously, this is just as ugly as Peter's answer.

Rich Seller · Accepted Answer · 2009-09-19 16:07:47Z

8

I strongly suggest using a factory interface if at all possible, rather than abusing reflection.

public interface MyFactory<T> { T newInstance(); }

edited Sep 19, 2009 at 16:07

Rich Seller

84.3k23 gold badges176 silver badges179 bronze badges

answered Sep 19, 2009 at 13:28

Tom Hawtin - tackline

148k30 gold badges222 silver badges314 bronze badges

3 Comments

Carl Over a year ago

I agree that abusing reflection is undesirable, but with this solution you have another class for every class that a design needs manufactured or you have to have a member of a class before you ever manufacture others, since interface methods can't be static.

Tom Hawtin - tackline Over a year ago

You can do it with a short anonymous inner class (perhaps assigned to a static final field, but because object creation is so fast that may even be a pessimisation. Having said that, the Java syntax does suck and JREs don't tend to be very memory efficient at handling many classes.

eric2323223 Over a year ago

@Tom, could you please explain this in more detail?

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Java generics question

3 Answers 3

3 Comments

Comments

3 Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

3 Answers 3

3 Comments

Comments

3 Comments

Linked

Related