It looks currently as though you are planning to retrieve all of the rows in the table and then select from them the page of data you actually require. It would likely be quicker to just select the page you need straight from the database, unless you do actually need all of the rows for some reason.
Assuming that your table names are always going to match exactly with their respective class/entity names, the following will give you a paged result (using postgres):
public class GenericRepository<T> : IGenericRepository<T> where T : class { public async Task<IEnumerable<T>> GetAllPagedAsync(int limit, int offset) { var tableName = typeof(T).Name; // assuming here you want the newest rows first, and column name is "created_date" // may also wish to specify the exact columns needed, rather than * var query = "SELECT * FROM @TableName ORDER BY created_date DESC Limit @Limit Offset @Offset"; var results = Connection.QueryAsync<T>(query, new {Limit = limit, Offset = offset}); return results; } }
A note regarding this. I am obviously not familiar with the structure or size of your database, however for most general purposes the limit/offset approach to paging shown here will most probably be sufficient. There are however some potential issues you may wish to consider:
- When the offset value gets very large performance may suffer.
- Paging tables with a high frequency of inserts in this fashion may cause results to be duplicated/ appear on multiple pages as the offset values does not take into account new rows added to the table since the last retrieval.
Whether or not these are likely to cause issues to your particular case, these potential drawbacks, as well as some alternatives solutions are outlined here.
