argparse option of options

Question

I am trying to add option of options in argparse. Currently I have:

group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group() group.add_argument("--md", help="Create xyz file for each ionic step for" " visualization", action='store_true') group.add_argument("--force", help="See which atom has maximum force", action='store_true') group.add_argument("--opt", help="grep string from file", nargs=2, metavar=("str", "file")) parser.add_argument("--xsf", help="Create xsf file for md(default is xyz)" " visualization", action='store_true') parser.add_argument("-N", help="Showing first N line", metavar='integer', type=int) parser.add_argument("-n", help="Showing last n line", metavar='integer', type=int) args = parser.parse_args()

which gives:

./foo.py --h usage: foo.py [-h] [--md | --force | --opt str file] [--xsf] [-N integer] [-n integer]

But I want --xsf as a suboption for --md, -N,-n for --opt; e.g.

./foo.py --h usage: foo.py [-h] [--md [--xsf]| --force | --opt str file [-N integer] [-n integer]]

But I dont know how to achieve that. May be I am missing something, but there is no option like that in argparse doc

Is there any other way of getting that?

If I add xsf to group, it can't be used with md, they will be mutually exclusive to one another. — BaRud
– BaRud, Commented Mar 15, 2016 at 16:25

hpaulj · Accepted Answer · 2016-03-15 17:41:22Z

The mutually_exclusive_group mechanism is quite simple, and does not work with any kind of nesting, or subgrouping.

There is a Python bug/issue requesting a more comprehensive grouping mechanism, but the proposed patch is rather complicated. The problem isn't just with testing, it's with defining the groups in a user friendly way, and with generating the usage line. It's nice that you included a desired usage, but that format is well beyond the capabilities of the current help formatter.

You might look into recasting your problem as a subparser one. subparsers are mutually exclusive (you can only give one command name), and you could specify --xsf as an argument for md, and -N as argument for --opt. But subparsers has its own help issues.

Another route is to write your own usage, and do your own testing of arguments after parsing. With a suitable choice of defaults you can usually tell whether an argument has been provided or not (the user can't specify None) or you can ignore unnecessary ones.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

argparse option of options

1 Answer 1

Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Linked

Related