2118

I want to get a list of all the branches in a Git repository with the "freshest" branches at the top, where the "freshest" branch is the one that's been committed to most recently (and is, therefore, more likely to be one I want to pay attention to).

Is there a way I can use Git to either (a) sort the list of branches by latest commit, or (b) get a list of branches together with each one's last-commit date, in some kind of machine-readable format?

Worst case, I could always run git branch to get a list of all the branches, parse its output, and then git log -n 1 branchname --format=format:%ci for each one, to get each branch's commit date. But this will run on a Windows box, where spinning up a new process is relatively expensive, so launching the Git executable once per branch could get slow if there are a lot of branches. Is there a way to do all this with a single command?

11
  • 3
    stackoverflow.com/a/2514279/1804124 Has a better answer. Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 3:36
  • 20
    @Spundun, you lost me there. How is a combination of multiple commands, including stuff piped through perl and sed, "better" than using a command that Git already has? Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 3:40
  • 1
    Because with the answer here , I didn't get all the branches in the repo. In my particular case, the answer would give me one branch and the answer there gave me 20 or so branches(with the -r option). Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 18:18
  • 52
    @Spundun regarding the answer with git for-each-ref from Jakub Narębski: you can get remote branches passing refs/remotes/ instead of refs/heads/ (or you can pass both, whitespace-separated); refs/tags/ for tags, or just refs/ for all three kinds. Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 4:45
  • 10
    Starting git 2.7 (Q4 2015), no more for-each-ref! You will use directly git branch --sort=-committerdate: see my answer below Commented Oct 16, 2015 at 5:58

35 Answers 35

2974

Use the --sort=-committerdate option of git for-each-ref;

Also available since Git 2.7.0 for git branch:

Basic Usage:

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ # Or using git branch (since version 2.7.0) git branch --sort=-committerdate # DESC git branch --sort=committerdate # ASC 

Result:

Result

Advanced Usage:

git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(HEAD) %(align:35)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset)%(end) - %(color:red)%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) - %(align:40)%(contents:subject)%(end) - %(authorname) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))' 

Result:

Result

Pro Usage (Unix):

You can put the following snippet in your ~/.gitconfig. The recentb alias accepts two arguments:

  • refbranch: which branch the ahead and behind columns are calculated against. Default master
  • count: how many recent branches to show. Default 20
[alias] # ATTENTION: All aliases prefixed with ! run in /bin/sh make sure you use sh syntax, not bash/zsh or whatever recentb = "!r() { refbranch=$1 count=$2; git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format='%(refname:short)|%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)' --color=always --count=${count:-20} | while read line; do branch=$(echo \"$line\" | awk 'BEGIN { FS = \"|\" }; { print $1 }' | tr -d '*'); ahead=$(git rev-list --count \"${refbranch:-origin/master}..${branch}\"); behind=$(git rev-list --count \"${branch}..${refbranch:-origin/master}\"); colorline=$(echo \"$line\" | sed 's/^[^|]*|//'); echo \"$ahead|$behind|$colorline\" | awk -F'|' -vOFS='|' '{$5=substr($5,1,70)}1' ; done | ( echo \"ahead|behind|branch|lastcommit|message|author\n\" && cat) | column -ts'|';}; r" 

Result:

Recentb alias result

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

39 Comments

Perfect! I can even restrict the output to just the ref names by appending --format=%(refname).
This is better for me: git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(refname) %(committerdate) %(authorname)' | sed 's/refs\/heads\///g'
@ilius: As @BeauSmith wrote: git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate --format='%(refname:short)' refs/heads/. git-for-each-ref(1) manpage says: For a non-ambiguous short name of the ref append :short.
This is a colorized version including hashes, messages, ordered ascending based on commit date, with the relative age of the last commit on each branch. I stole all of the ideas from you guys above. It's in my .gitconfig in the [alias] section and I love it. br = for-each-ref --sort=committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(HEAD) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) - %(color:red)%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) - %(contents:subject) - %(authorname) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))'
@MikePercy ...what uh...what else you got in your .gitconfig[alias]? :)
|
198

Here is a simple command that lists all branches with latest commits:

git branch -v 

To order by most recent commit, use

git branch -v --sort=committerdate 

Source: http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Branching-Branch-Management

7 Comments

git branch -av if you want to see non-local branches too.
Is it easy to get git branch -v to include the date of each commit listed?
This is awesome. I like git branch -va --sort=-committerdate to show non-local branches, with the most recently changed branches at the top.
git branch -v --format='%(committerdate:short) %(refname:short)' will include the date.
For those coming from search, yes, committerdate will catch the last time that you amended or rebased. (The other possibility is authordate, which amend or rebase will not change by default.)
|
165

List of Git branch names, ordered by most recent commit…

Expanding on Jakub’s answer and Joe’s tip, the following will strip out the "refs/heads/" so the output only displays the branch names:


Command:

git for-each-ref --count=30 --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short)' 

Result:

Recent Git branches

6 Comments

Is there any way to do this for the REMOTE repository?
aah - @jakub.g already explained: you can get remote branches passing refs/remotes/ instead of refs/heads/. Perfect!!
I like this one, if you're trying to alias it, which I did, to git rb remember to surround the command in quotes: git config --global alias.rb "for-each-ref --count=20 --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format=\'%(refname:short)\'"
And now you can do this with git branch, so getting local, remote or all branches works like on git-branch (i.e. -r, -a). git branch -r --sort=committerdate --format='%(HEAD) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) - %(color:red)%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) - %(contents:subject) - %(authorname) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))'
@AllanBowe the following will output the top 5 active branches in a repo: git branch -va --sort=committerdate | tail -5. Perhaps that's an alternative to what you were asking and discovered.
|
106

Here's the optimal code, which combines the other two answers:

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(committerdate:short) %(authorname) %(refname:short)' 

4 Comments

Even a little mor optimized to get a tabular output: git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(committerdate:short) %(authorname) %(refname:short)'
for some reason i had to use double-quotes on windows, but otherwise these work just fine :)
@schoetbi That code looks exactly like the one from nikolay, what did you change to make it tabular?
@Enrico and others that may wonder about the same thing. nikolay changed his answer using schoetbis suggestion. By moving date first which is always the same length the result seems more tabular.
102

I use the following alias:

recent = "!r() { count=$1; git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format='%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)' --color=always --count=${count:=10} | column -ts'|';}; r"

which produces:

Result

We can also give a custom count, e.g.,

git recent 20 (the default is 10).

19 Comments

At least in the latest version of git you can just add '%(HEAD) ...' at the start of the format string to get the same effect without piping throught the sed command
I could not git this to work as a git alias. I had to use [alias] recent = !git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format='%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)'|column -ts'|'
I had to add --color=always to get color. git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format='%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)' --color=always|column -ts'|'}
@mwfearnley: For me, putting a semicolon inside the braces helped !r(){git for-each-ref ... ;}; r
I also need to add a semi-colon after -ts'|' i.e. "!r(){ git ... -ts'|'; }; r"
|
94

I was able to reference the previous examples to create something that works best for me.

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format='%(authordate:short) %(color:red)%(objectname:short) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))'

Screenshot of Output

As suggested in the comments below you can also include remote branches and the author's name.

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads refs/remotes --format='%(authordate:short) %(color:red)%(objectname:short) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset)) %(authorname)'

Screenshot of Output

Here are both commands as shell aliases that you can easily add to your shell profile.

# show a list of local git branches sorted by the commit date alias git.branches='git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads --format="%(authordate:short) %(color:red)%(objectname:short) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))"' # show a list of local and remote git branches sorted by the commit date alias git.branches.remote='git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads refs/remotes --format="%(authordate:short) %(color:red)%(objectname:short) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset)) %(authorname)"' 

5 Comments

That looks nice, more colorful than using directly git branch as I suggested in stackoverflow.com/a/33163401/6309. +1
Thanks, @VonC glad you like it!
Ditto - this one worked out-of-box, unlike a number of others I just tried. Thanks.
This one is clean and neat. Sometime I'd add remote and authorname as this: git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ refs/remotes --format='%(authordate:short) %(authorname) %(color:red)%(objectname:short) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) (%(color:green)%(committerdate:relative)%(color:reset))'
Please review Why not upload images of code/errors when asking a question? (e.g., "Images should only be used to illustrate problems that can't be made clear in any other way, such as to provide screenshots of a user interface.") and take the appropriate action (it covers answers and screen output as well).
54

As of Git 2.19 you can simply sort by committer date using the comitterdate sort option with the branch command:

git branch --sort=-committerdate 

If whenever you list branches in the current repository, you want them sorted by comitter date, you can set the branch.sort config variable for the current repository:

git config branch.sort -committerdate 

If whenever you list branches in any repository, you want them sorted by comitterdate, you can set the branch.sort variable globally:

git config --global branch.sort -committerdate 

Disclaimer: I'm the author of this feature in Git, and I implemented it when I saw this question.

8 Comments

Most up-to-date answer, far easier than using complex scripts or aliases 👌
Use with caution! Beware everyone, this is not a command to list the branches. It's a command to change the configuration of Git and will have permanent global repercussions.
@Jazimov you are right, I edited the answer so it's clearer
thank you for adding this neat feature, @smaftoul, i use it a lot. ; )
@theartofrain you're welcome, I also use it a lot ;)
|
47

git 2.7 (Q4 2015) will introduce branch sorting using directly git branch:
See commit aa3bc55, commit aedcb7d, commit 1511b22, commit f65f139, ... (23 Sep 2015), commit aedcb7d, commit 1511b22, commit ca41799 (24 Sep 2015), and commit f65f139, ... (23 Sep 2015) by Karthik Nayak (KarthikNayak).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 7f11b48, 15 Oct 2015)

In particular, commit aedcb7d:

branch.c: use 'ref-filter' APIs

Make 'branch.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs sorting. This removes most of the code used in 'branch.c' replacing it with calls to the 'ref-filter' library.

It adds the option --sort=<key>:

Sort based on the key given.
Prefix - to sort in descending order of the value.

You may use the --sort=<key> option multiple times, in which case the last key becomes the primary key.

The keys supported are the same as those in git for-each-ref.
Sort order defaults to sorting based on the full refname (including refs/... prefix). This lists detached HEAD (if present) first, then local branches and finally remote-tracking branches.

Here:

git branch --sort=-committerdate 

Or (see below with Git 2.19)

# if you are sure to /always/ want to see branches ordered by commits: git config --global branch.sort -committerdate git branch 

See also commit 9e46833 (30 Oct 2015) by Karthik Nayak (KarthikNayak).
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano (gitster).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 415095f, 03 Nov 2015)

When sorting as per numerical values (e.g. --sort=objectsize) there is no fallback comparison when both refs hold the same value. This can cause unexpected results (i.e. the order of listing refs with equal values cannot be pre-determined) as pointed out by Johannes Sixt ($gmane/280117).

Hence, fallback to alphabetical comparison based on the refname whenever the other criterion is equal.

$ git branch --sort=objectsize * (HEAD detached from fromtag) branch-two branch-one master 

With Git 2.19, the sort order can be set by default.
git branch supports a config branch.sort, like git tag, which already had a config tag.sort.
See commit 560ae1c (16 Aug 2018) by Samuel Maftoul (``).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit d89db6f, 27 Aug 2018)

branch.sort: 

This variable controls the sort ordering of branches when displayed by git-branch.
Without the "--sort=<value>" option provided, the value of this variable will be used as the default.


To list remote branches, use git branch -r --sort=objectsize. The -r flag causes it to list remote branches instead of local branches.


With Git 2.27 (Q2 2020), "git branch" and other "for-each-ref" variants accepted multiple --sort=<key> options in the increasing order of precedence, but it had a few breakages around "--ignore-case" handling, and tie-breaking with the refname, which have been fixed.

See commit 7c5045f, commit 76f9e56 (03 May 2020) by Jeff King (peff).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 6de1630, 08 May 2020)

ref-filter: apply fallback refname sort only after all user sorts

Signed-off-by: Jeff King

Commit 9e468334b4 ("ref-filter: fallback on alphabetical comparison", 2015-10-30, Git v2.7.0-rc0 -- merge listed in batch #10) taught ref-filter's sort to fallback to comparing refnames.
But it did it at the wrong level, overriding the comparison result for a single "--sort" key from the user, rather than after all sort keys have been exhausted.

This worked correctly for a single "--sort" option, but not for multiple ones.
We'd break any ties in the first key with the refname and never evaluate the second key at all.

To make matters even more interesting, we only applied this fallback sometimes!
For a field like "taggeremail" which requires a string comparison, we'd truly return the result of strcmp(), even if it was 0.
But for numerical "value" fields like "taggerdate", we did apply the fallback. And that's why our multiple-sort test missed this: it uses taggeremail as the main comparison.

So let's start by adding a much more rigorous test. We'll have a set of commits expressing every combination of two tagger emails, dates, and refnames. Then we can confirm that our sort is applied with the correct precedence, and we'll be hitting both the string and value comparators.

That does show the bug, and the fix is simple: moving the fallback to the outer compare_refs() function, after all ref_sorting keys have been exhausted.

Note that in the outer function we don't have an "ignore_case" flag, as it's part of each individual ref_sorting element. It's debatable what such a fallback should do, since we didn't use the user's keys to match.
But until now we have been trying to respect that flag, so the least-invasive thing is to try to continue to do so.
Since all callers in the current code either set the flag for all keys or for none, we can just pull the flag from the first key. In a hypothetical world where the user really can flip the case-insensitivity of keys separately, we may want to extend the code to distinguish that case from a blanket "--ignore-case".


The implementation of "git branch --sort"(man) wrt the detached HEAD display has always been hacky, which has been cleaned up with Git 2.31 (Q1 2021).

See commit 4045f65, commit 2708ce6, commit 7c269a7, commit d094748, commit 75c50e5 (07 Jan 2021), and commit 08bf6a8, commit ffdd02a (06 Jan 2021) by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (avar).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 9e409d7, 25 Jan 2021)

branch: show "HEAD detached" first under reverse sort

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Change the output of the likes of "git branch -l --sort=-objectsize"(man) to show the "(HEAD detached at <hash>)" message at the start of the output.
Before the compare_detached_head() function added in a preceding commit we'd emit this output as an emergent effect.

It doesn't make any sense to consider the objectsize, type or other non-attribute of the "(HEAD detached at <hash>)" message for the purposes of sorting.
Let's always emit it at the top instead.
The only reason it was sorted in the first place is because we're injecting it into the ref-filter machinery so builtin/branch.c doesn't need to do its own "am I detached?" detection.


With Git 2.35 (Q1 2022), things like "git -c branch.sort=bogus branch new HEAD"(man), i.e.
the operation modes of the "git branch"(man) command that do not need the sort key information, no longer errors out by seeing a bogus sort key.

See commit 98e7ab6, commit 1a89796 (20 Oct 2021) by Junio C Hamano (gitster).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 5126145, 29 Nov 2021)

for-each-ref: delay parsing of --sort=<atom> options

The for-each-ref family of commands invoke parsers immediately when it sees each --sort=<atom> option, and die before even seeing the other options on the command line when the <atom> is unrecognised.

Instead, accumulate them in a string list, and have them parsed into a ref_sorting structure after the command line parsing is done.
As a consequence, "git branch --sort=bogus -h"(man) used to fail to give the brief help, which arguably may have been a feature, now does so, which is more consistent with how other options work.

1 Comment

To list remotes with this option, add -r
44

I also needed colors, tags and remote references without any duplicates:

for ref in $(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate --format="%(refname)" refs/heads/ refs/remotes ); do git log -n1 $ref --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%cr%Creset %C(yellow)%d%Creset %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset%n" | cat ; done | awk '! a[$0]++' 

Because quoting can be hard, here is the alias for Bash:

alias glist='for ref in $(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate --format="%(refname)" refs/heads/ refs/remotes ); do git log -n1 $ref --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%cr%Creset %C(yellow)%d%Creset %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset%n" | cat ; done | awk '"'! a["'$0'"]++'" 

8 Comments

$ <your command here> awk: syntax error near line 1 awk: bailing out near line 1
@GotNoSugarBaby You are using single quotes like the example right? which shell are you using? Bash gives that character a special meaning otherwise.
hey, I ran this on /bin/bash (GNU bash, version 4.0.28(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11)) with a straight copy and paste of your example — but since then I've run it on /bin/bash (GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin12)) and it works, so I'll remove the down-vote. Thanks a lot estani.
@GotNoSugarBaby I use 4.2.25(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) nad tried on 3.x and worked. I'm not sure what issue it was... but it might have bennn a git version related issue, instead of a bash one. In any case, I'm glad it works for you!
@MichaelDiscenza just pipe everything to head. that would be to add | head -n20 at the end. If you are using the alias, be sure this goes within the quotes.
|
36

Another variation:

git branch -r --sort=-committerdate --format='%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)' --color=always | column -ts'|' 

It is worth noting that even though it's looking at changes in remote branches, it's worth synchronising with origin before running the command (you can use Git fetch), as I found it can return out of date information if your local Git folder hasn't been updated in a while.

Also, this is a version that works in Windows cmd and PowerShell:

git branch -r --sort=-committerdate --format="%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)|%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)|%(color:blue)%(subject)|%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)" --color=always 

3 Comments

Thanks for the answer for Windows Cmd/Powershell. I can confirm it also works in Cmder.
Drop the -r ifi you want your local branches, and not just what's been pushed/synced to your remote(s).
Thank you, you checked remote branches too, that is I want!
34

Getting just the top five branch names sorted based on committer date:

git branch --sort=-committerdate | head -5

Comments

26

The other answers don't seem to allow passing -vv to get verbose output.

So here's a one-liner that sorts git branch -vv by commit date, preserving color etc:

git branch -vv --color=always | while read; do echo -e $(git log -1 --format=%ct $(echo "_$REPLY" | awk '{print $2}' | perl -pe 's/\e\[?.*?[\@-~]//g') 2> /dev/null || git log -1 --format=%ct)"\t$REPLY"; done | sort -r | cut -f 2 

If you additionally want to print the commit date, you can use this version instead:

git branch -vv --color=always | while read; do echo -e $(git log -1 --format=%ci $(echo "_$REPLY" | awk '{print $2}' | perl -pe 's/\e\[?.*?[\@-~]//g') 2> /dev/null || git log -1 --format=%ci)" $REPLY"; done | sort -r | cut -d ' ' -f -1,4- 

Sample output:

2013-09-15 master da39a3e [origin/master: behind 7] Some patch 2013-09-11 * (detached from 3eba4b8) 3eba4b8 Some other patch 2013-09-09 my-feature e5e6b4b [master: ahead 2, behind 25] WIP 

It's probably more readable split into multiple lines:

git branch -vv --color=always | while read; do # The underscore is because the active branch is preceded by a '*', and # for awk I need the columns to line up. The perl call is to strip out # ansi colors; if you don't pass --color=always above you can skip this local branch=$(echo "_$REPLY" | awk '{print $2}' | perl -pe 's/\e\[?.*?[\@-~]//g') # git log fails when you pass a detached head as a branch name. # Hide the error and get the date of the current head. local branch_modified=$(git log -1 --format=%ci "$branch" 2> /dev/null || git log -1 --format=%ci) echo -e "$branch_modified $REPLY" # cut strips the time and timezone columns, leaving only the date done | sort -r | cut -d ' ' -f -1,4- 

This should also work with other arguments to git branch, e.g. -vvr to list remote-tracking branches, or -vva to list both remote-tracking and local branches.

6 Comments

-vv can be useful indeed, thanks. However, this solution still spawns new processes for each branch, which the OP wanted to avoid.
Actually git branch doesn't specifically define the meaning of -vv, but only of -v, so -vv should have the same as -v.
This is the best. And adding -avv makes it take into account remote branches as well. Thanks for this!
@musiphil My git branch manpage, section -v, -vv, --verbose contains the following: If given twice, print the name of the upstream branch, as well
@Perleone: I don't know how I got that information, but you are right, and I stand corrected. Thanks!
|
26

I find the following command helpful for my purposes.

git branch --sort=-committerdate | head -n 10 

This will list the latest 10 branches. It is short and can be used without an alias as well.

1 Comment

git config --global alias.br "! git branch --sort=-committerdate | head -n 10"
22

I like using a relative date and shortening the branch name like this:

git for-each-ref --sort='-authordate:iso8601' --format=' %(authordate:relative)%09%(refname:short)' refs/heads 

Which gives you output:

21 minutes ago nathan/a_recent_branch 6 hours ago master 27 hours ago nathan/some_other_branch 29 hours ago branch_c 6 days ago branch_d 

I recommend making a Bash file for adding all your favorite aliases and then sharing the script out to your team. Here's an example to add just this one:

#!/bin/sh git config --global alias.branches "!echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------' && git for-each-ref --sort='-authordate:iso8601' --format=' %(authordate:relative)%09%(refname:short)' refs/heads && echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------'" 

Then you can just do this to get a nicely formatted and sorted local branch list:

git branches 

Update: Do this if you want coloring:

#!/bin/sh # (echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------‌​' && git for-each-ref --sort='-authordate:iso8601' --format=' %(authordate:relative)%09%(refname:short)' refs/heads && echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------‌​') | grep --color -E "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)$|$" 

4 Comments

This gives me fatal: unknown field name: '-authordate:iso8601'
Fancy colored output is fancy, but this is simple and just what I was looking for. Replace refs/heads with refs/remotes to have a look at remote branches.
The command itself is lovely, but the alias throws an error: expansion of alias 'branches' failed; 'echo' is not a git command
Works for me. What happens if you just copy paste this into terminal? (echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------‌​' && git for-each-ref --sort='-authordate:iso8601' --format=' %(authordate:relative)%09%(refname:short)' refs/heads && echo ' ------------------------------------------------------------‌​') | grep --color -E "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)$|$"
13

I came up with the following command (for Git 2.13 and later):

git branch -r --sort=creatordate \ --format "%(creatordate:relative);%(committername);%(refname:lstrip=-1)" \ | grep -v ";HEAD$" \ | column -s ";" -t 

If you don’t have column you can replace the last line with

 | sed -e "s/;/\t/g" 

The output looks like

6 years ago Tom Preston-Werner book 4 years, 4 months ago Parker Moore 0.12.1-release 4 years ago Matt Rogers 1.0-branch 3 years, 11 months ago Matt Rogers 1.2_branch 3 years, 1 month ago Parker Moore v1-stable 12 months ago Ben Balter pages-as-documents 10 months ago Jordon Bedwell make-jekyll-parallel 6 months ago Pat Hawks to_integer 5 months ago Parker Moore 3.4-stable-backport-5920 4 months ago Parker Moore yajl-ruby-2-4-patch 4 weeks ago Parker Moore 3.4-stable 3 weeks ago Parker Moore rouge-1-and-2 19 hours ago jekyllbot master 

I wrote a blog post about how the various pieces work.

2 Comments

Nice. +1. It does use the git branch --sort I mentioned in stackoverflow.com/a/33163401/6309.
@DanNissenbaum Make sure you’re using Git 2.13 (released in May 2017) or later.
12

Adds some color (since pretty-format isn't available)

[alias] branchdate = for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format="%(authordate:short)%09%(objectname:short)%09%1B[0;33m%(refname:short)%1B[m%09" 

Comments

11

Git v2.19 introduces branch.sort configuration option (see branch.sort).

So git branch will sort by committer date (descending) by default with

# gitconfig [branch] sort = -committerdate # Descending 

Script:

git config --global branch.sort -committerdate 

So,

git branch 

Output:

* dev master _ 

And

git branch -v 

Output:

* dev 0afecf5 Merge branch 'oc' into dev master 652428a Merge branch 'dev' _ 7159cf9 Merge branch 'bashrc' into dev 

Comments

9

I had the same problem, so I wrote a Ruby gem called Twig. It lists branches in chronological order (newest first), and can also let you set a max age so that you don't list all branches (if you have a lot of them). For example:

$ twig issue status todo branch ----- ------ ---- ------ 2013-01-26 18:00:21 (7m ago) 486 In progress Rebase optimize-all-the-things 2013-01-26 16:49:21 (2h ago) 268 In progress - whitespace-all-the-things 2013-01-23 18:35:21 (3d ago) 159 Shipped Test in prod * refactor-all-the-things 2013-01-22 17:12:09 (4d ago) - - - development 2013-01-20 19:45:42 (6d ago) - - - master 

It also lets you store custom properties for each branch, e.g., ticket id, status, todos, and filter the list of branches according to these properties. More info: http://rondevera.github.io/twig/

1 Comment

That name might not help as I am pretty sure there are a few pieces of software out there with the same name.
9

FYI, if you'd like to get a list of recently checked out branches (as opposed to recently committed) you can use Git's reflog:

$ git reflog | egrep -io "moving from ([^[:space:]]+)" | awk '{ print $3 }' | head -n5 master stable master some-cool-feature feature/improve-everything 

See also: How can I get a list of Git branches that I've recently checked out?

Comments

7

Here's a little script that I use to switch between recent branches:

#!/bin/bash # sudo bash re='^[0-9]+$' if [[ "$1" =~ $re ]]; then lines="$1" else lines=10 fi branches="$(git recent | tail -n $lines | nl)" branches_nf="$(git recent-nf | tail -n $lines | nl)" echo "$branches" # Prompt which server to connect to max="$(echo "$branches" | wc -l)" index= while [[ ! ( "$index" =~ ^[0-9]+$ && "$index" -gt 0 && "$index" -le "$max" ) ]]; do echo -n "Checkout to: " read index done branch="$( echo "$branches_nf" | sed -n "${index}p" | awk '{ print $NF }' )" git co $branch clear 

Using those two aliases:

recent = for-each-ref --sort=committerdate refs/heads/ --format=' %(color:blue) %(authorname) %(color:yellow)%(refname:short)%(color:reset)' recent-nf = for-each-ref --sort=committerdate refs/heads/ --format=' %(authorname) %(refname:short)' 

Just call that in a Git repository, and it will show you the last N branches (10 by default) and a number aside each. Input the number of the branch, and it checks out:

Enter image description here

1 Comment

Please review Why not upload images of code/errors when asking a question? (e.g., "Images should only be used to illustrate problems that can't be made clear in any other way, such as to provide screenshots of a user interface.") and take the appropriate action (it covers answers as well).
5

Normally we consider the remote branches recently. So try this

git fetch git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/remotes/origin 

Comments

5

Here is another script that does what all the other scripts do. In fact, it provides a function for your shell.

Its contribution is that it pulls some colours from your Git configuration (or uses defaults).

# Git Branch by Date # Usage: gbd [ -r ] gbd() { local reset_color=`tput sgr0` local subject_color=`tput setaf 4 ; tput bold` local author_color=`tput setaf 6` local target=refs/heads local branch_color=`git config --get-color color.branch.local white` if [ "$1" = -r ] then target=refs/remotes/origin branch_color=`git config --get-color color.branch.remote red` fi git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate $target --format="${branch_color}%(refname:short)${reset_color} ${subject_color}%(subject)${reset_color} ${author_color}- %(authorname) (%(committerdate:relative))${reset_color}" } 

Comments

4

This is based on saeedgnu's version, but with the current branch shown with a star and in color, and only showing anything that is not described as "months" or "years" ago:

current_branch="$(git symbolic-ref --short -q HEAD)" git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate refs/heads \ --format='%(refname:short)|%(committerdate:relative)' \ | grep -v '\(year\|month\)s\? ago' \ | while IFS='|' read branch date do start=' ' end='' if [[ $branch = $current_branch ]]; then start='* \e[32m' end='\e[0m' fi printf "$start%-30s %s$end\\n" "$branch" "$date" done 

Comments

4
git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ # Or using Git branch (since version 2.7.0) git branch --sort=-committerdate # Descending git branch --sort=committerdate # Ascending 

1 Comment

An explanation would be in order. E.g., what is the idea/gist? How does it contrast with the previous 30 answers? From the Help Center: "...always explain why the solution you're presenting is appropriate and how it works". Please respond by editing (changing) your answer, not here in comments (without "Edit:", "Update:", or similar - the answer should appear as if it was written today).
3

My best result as a script:

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short)|%(committerdate:iso)|%(authorname)' | sed 's/refs\/heads\///g' | grep -v BACKUP | while IFS='|' read branch date author do printf '%-15s %-30s %s\n' "$branch" "$date" "$author" done 

1 Comment

What kind of script? Bash?
3

The accepted command-line answer rocks, but if you want something prettier, like a GUI, and your origin === "github".

You can click "Branches" in the repository. Or hit the URL directly: https://github.com/ORGANIZATION_NAME/REPO_NAME/branches

Comments

3

The simplest one to print along with the last commit date:

git branch --all --format='%(committerdate:short) %(refname:short)'|sort 

Comments

2

Here's the variation I was looking for:

git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate --format='%(committerdate)%09%(refname:short)' refs/heads/ | tail -r 

That tail -r reverses the list so the most-recent commiterdate is last.

2 Comments

You can also change --sort=-committerdate to --sort=committerdate to accomplish this.
Which tail has -r?
2

I know there are a lot of answers already, but here are my two cents for a simple alias (I like to have my most recent branch at the bottom):

[alias] br = !git branch --sort=committerdate --color=always | tail -n15 [color "branch"] current = yellow local = cyan remote = red 

This will give you a nice overview of your latest 15 branches, in color, with your current branch highlighted (and it has an asterisk).

Comments

2

I didn't find exactly what I was looking so here is my version based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/66134817/1958520, which:

  • works under Windows (but you have to have awk installed - mine came with MinGW, can be installed with Git, Cygwin, ....)
  • is not based on complex aliases to be usable as one-liner in command line / script
  • is colorized
  • uses recent git branch --sort=committerdate
  • output is aligned to columns

So here it is:

git branch -a --sort=committerdate --format='%(HEAD)%(color:yellow)%(refname:short)@SEP@%(color:bold green)%(committerdate:relative)@SEP@%(color:magenta)%(authorname)%(color:reset)@SEP@%(color:blue)%(subject)' --color=always | awk -F "@SEP@" '{printf("%-100s %-30s %-20s %s \n", $1, $2, $3, $4)}' 

When inside cmd script it has to be modified to handle %:

git branch -a --sort=committerdate --format="%%(HEAD)%%(color:yellow)%%(refname:short)@SEP@%%(color:bold green)%%(committerdate:relative)@SEP@%%(color:magenta)%%(authorname)%%(color:reset)@SEP@%%(color:blue)%%(subject)" --color=always | awk -F "@SEP@" '{printf("%%-100s %%-30s %%-20s %%s \n", $1, $2, $3, $4)}' 

Screenshot for openapi-generator github repo

Notes, howto:

  • use --sort=-committerdate to reverse the sort order
  • numbers and hyphens in awk printf spec "%-100s %-30s %-20s %s \n" are columns length and aligning specifications so this is a place for customization
  • @SEP@ is used as a unique separator string, which then awk uses to match data columns via -F "@SEP". Overkill but avoids accidental confusion when using some simple separator

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.