How to explicitly summon and use Functor for function

Question

import scala.language.higherKinds import cats.Functor import cats.instances.list._ import cats.instances.function._ val list1 = List(1, 2) val list2 = Functor[List].map(list1)(i => i + 1)

But things don't work so smoothly for functions,

val f1 = (i: Int) => i.toString val f2 = (s: String) => s

And we have to resort to type trickery,

scala> type TTT[A] = Int => A // defined type alias TTT scala> val ff = Functor[TTT].map(f1)(f2) // ff: TTT[String] = scala.Function1$$Lambda$607/69160933@3a689738

Well... Is there a more direct way to solve this, as this tends to get very tedious for complex functions.

Dmytro Mitin · Accepted Answer · 2018-09-13 08:10:43Z

4

You can write

val ff = Functor[Int => ?].map(f1)(f2)

if you add addCompilerPlugin("org.spire-math" %% "kind-projector" % "0.9.7") to build.sbt.

Or you can import functor syntax import cats.syntax.functor._ and then write with type ascription

val ff = (f1: TTT[String]).map(f2)

or with explicit type annotation

val f1: TTT[String] = (i: Int) => i.toString val ff = f1.map(f2)

answered Sep 13, 2018 at 8:10

Dmytro Mitin

53.1k3 gold badges34 silver badges76 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

Hugo Firth Over a year ago

As per this answer, I would advise using kind-projector if you can. Its fairly standard across functional projects and even if people aren't familiar with it the syntax feels fairly natural/self explanatory

sarveshseri Over a year ago

@HugoFirth kind-projector looks good. I am not sure if I remember correctly but didn't Erik Osheim decide to transition to Rust few months back ?

Seth Tisue Over a year ago

@SarveshKumarSingh eh? no, I think you have Erik confused with someone else. regardless, kind-projector is a cornerstone of the Typelevel ecosystem, so even if Erik were to disappear, kind-projector would certainly continue to exist, there are lots of other people in Typelevel.

Matthias Berndt · Accepted Answer · 2018-10-06 08:45:38Z

Why would you summon the type class instance explicitly in the first place? cats includes syntax support for functor, so there's no need for that.

import cats.syntax.functor._ import cats.instances.function._ val mul4 = ((a: Int) => a * 2).map(_ * 2)

In order for this to work, you'll need the -Ypartial-unification compiler flag (scalacOptions += "-Ypartial-unification" if you're using sbt). This flag is likely to be enabled by default in future scala versions.

There is a need to summon the implicit when you want to do something to the implicit itself.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

How to explicitly summon and use Functor for function

2 Answers 2

3 Comments

1 Comment

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

3 Comments

1 Comment

Related