Object.hasOwnProperty multiple levels without error [duplicate]

Question

I wonder if there is some way to use hasOwnProperty for an object for multiple levels.

To illustrate: I have following object:

var Client = { ID: 1, Details: { Title: 'Dr', Sex: 'male' } }

I can now do the following in javascript:

('Title' in Client.Details) -> true

However I cannot! do:

('Street' in Client.Adress)

...yet I must first use an if to not throw an error. Because I might have a large object - I only need to know if there is "Adress" in Client.Details without using prior if statements, any idea if that is possible?

// this is overkill -> (will be many more if-statements for checking a lower level if('Adress' in Client){ console.log('Street' in Client.Adress) } else { console.log(false) }

Example which produces the error:

var Client = { ID: 1, Details: { Title: 'Dr', Sex: 'male' } } // Results in Error: ('Street' in Client.Adress) // Results in Error: if('Street' in Client.Adress){}

console.log('Adress' in Client && 'Street' in Client.Adress)? — Bergi
– Bergi, Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 13:48
I have added an example for you that shows there is an error — DavidDunham
– DavidDunham, Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 14:03
Yes I see that there's an error. But no, it's not overkill to check for every property that you are accessing, and no you don't need many more if statements for that. — Bergi
– Bergi, Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 14:13
Well above is a very simplified example. Imaging an object with 10+ levels and I merely want to know if at level 7 there is object "XYZ" present or not. That would mean 6 (I think) if-statements just to not have the code crash in an error, which in my opinion is overkill — DavidDunham
– DavidDunham, Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 14:41
No, not if statements! Just chain them together using the && operator. You can put that expression in a single if condition. For alternative approaches see the duplicates — Bergi
– Bergi, Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 14:45

Zenoo · Accepted Answer · 2018-09-13 13:53:38Z

You could pass the path of your attributes via a String and use a recursive function to run your object down:

const checkPath = (o, path) => { if(path.includes('.')){ if(o.hasOwnProperty(path.split('.')[0])) return checkPath(o[path.split('.')[0]], path.split('.').slice(1).join('.')); else return false }else return o.hasOwnProperty(path); }

And use it like this :

checkPath(Client, 'Details.Title')

Demo:

let Client = { ID: 1, Details: { Title: 'Dr', Sex: 'male' } }; const checkPath = (o, path) => { if(path.includes('.')){ if(o.hasOwnProperty(path.split('.')[0])) return checkPath(o[path.split('.')[0]], path.split('.').slice(1).join('.')); else return false }else return o.hasOwnProperty(path); } console.log(checkPath(Client, 'Details.Title')); console.log(checkPath(Client, 'Test.Title'));

Here's the sexy one-liner:

const checkPath = (o, path) => path.includes('.') ? o.hasOwnProperty(path.split('.')[0]) ? checkPath(o[path.split('.')[0]], path.split('.').slice(1).join('.')) : false : o.hasOwnProperty(path);

Seems good. Tried with checkPath(Client, 'Details.Address.Drive') and it works. Do you think there is any problems when the object gets more complicated? (containing functions etc.)
@DavidDunham It won't execute functions for you, if that's what you mean. Other than that, it should hold fine.
No I meant if the object complexity (with functions) might break the functionality of your code because it's not "common" to have functions in an object.
As I said, if you check for a path that contains a function, it won't execute it, thus will not continue to check the next attribute.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Object.hasOwnProperty multiple levels without error [duplicate]

1 Answer 1

4 Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

4 Comments

Linked

Related