2

I'm going through someone else's code and came across the following syntax:

typedef struct abc { abc() : member(0){} unsigned int member } 

It seems like a class with member variable and a constructor, except it is declared struct. I have two questions here.

  1. Is this syntax supported in C?
  2. What would be a reason to use structs over classes?

Thanks a lot in advance.

PS: how do I format the code?

2
  • I formatted the code for you by indenting 4 spaces. You can highlight the code and press the {} icon above the editing field. You need to leave a blank line before and after the code. Similar thing goes for the numbered list. Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 17:06
  • see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2750270/c-c-struct-vs-class Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 17:07

6 Answers 6

8

This is not valid C.

In C++, struct and class are essentially synonyms. The only difference is that members and inheritance are public by default in a struct, and private by default in a class.

There are no hard guidelines on whether to choose struct or class. However, you'll often find people using struct only for simple C-like plain old data structures ("PODs").

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

The same goes for inheritance.
I often use struct when building functors.
3

This is most assuredly just C++. struct and class are identical in C++, except for defaulting to public instead of private for inheritance and class contents.

Comments

0

In C++, struct and class are essentially the same thing, except that for a struct members are public by default. So just read it as you would a class.

Comments

0

abc() is a constructor of class abc, member is a internal variable, constructor abc defaults set member as 0.

Comments

0
  1. The syntax is supported. The constructor initializes member to 0 and does nothing else.
  2. struct has a default access of public.

Comments

0

This is C++ code, however using typedef struct (that comes from C) in C++ code is awful. There is difference between C and C++ and in C++ you don't need to typedef structs. struct MyStruct is sufficient declaration if you want to refer your struct via MyStruct myStruct;. Mixing C with C++ is bad.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.