What are the maximum number of threads which can be maintained by the Java virtual machine?
I did not explain this in my original question, but I am trying to benchmark the JVM and would like to try and see how many threads it can concurrently maintain.
Creating threads in a loop until an exception is thrown is an option, however, I would like to know if there is a better way to do this.
There will be some limits imposed by your operating system and hardware configuration.
To raise the number of concurrent threads you should lower the default stacksize java -Xss 64k.
ulimit -a will give you the configured limits, for user processes and memorycat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max - a maximum of 32k processes.cat /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max
You can reduce your stack size by running with the -Xss option. For example: java -server -Xss64k and : 64k is the least amount of stack space allowed per thread -- which doesnt make much sense since the allocation granularity can be different from system to system : msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686774.aspx but ... hey ... i guess sun/oracle developers arent "good with WINAPI" :)Note that on some versions of Windows, the OS may round up thread stack sizes using very coarse granularity. The possibility to use a smaller stacksize was included in my very first answer, with 64kb which seems to be the typical system's allocation granularity for windows according to the article linked by you.Writing a loop that creates new threads until it blows up is the definitive way to find out. You might well see performance degrade terribly before it actually dies.
I don't know if there's any configuration parameter or other built-in limit in the JVM off the top of my head. I've never run into a limit in practice. Of course sooner or later you will run out of memory, maybe some other resource.
I suspect that there is not a limit on number of threads per se, but rather on resources associated with a thread. That is, you might see that you can have 10,000 threads if all of them are running just one small class with a few bytes of data each, but the number drops rapidly when they each have an array of 10 million strings.
The limit, if there is one, will be imposed by the operating system, not the jvm
primitives like int still exist and are used everywhere ;). If one wanted to write software which is immune to these problems one would have to use BigInteger and whatnot - absolutely everywhere, even for loop indices.
The real question should be not how many threads you can create but how many threads will run efficiently. Too many threads and you will cause thrashing, too few and less computation time.
First, question, how long to live is your thread. Short live threads are hardly worth the effort. Large computations on the other hand make perfect sense.
Second, how much memory will each thread consume. Take the amount of memory each thread requires and divided it by the amount of memory available. You should not create more threads than this.
Thirdly, how many CPUs do you have available. You should not create more threads than CPUs. In fact, you should consider at least one less than the number of threads. On a windows laptop with 4 CPUs, you should never have more than 3 Threads if efficient processing is required.
Finally, what does your thread do. If it reads and writes to a hard drive, then you can have more threads than the number of CPUs since it will have to wait for the device to respond. Consider the following method when deciding the number of threads:
public static int recommendedThreadCount() { int mRtnValue = 0; Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime(); long maxMemory = runtime.maxMemory(); long mTotalMemory = runtime.totalMemory(); long freeMemory = runtime.freeMemory(); int mAvailableProcessors = runtime.availableProcessors(); long mTotalFreeMemory = freeMemory + (maxMemory - mTotalMemory); mRtnValue = (int)(mTotalFreeMemory/4200000000l); int mNoOfThreads = mAvailableProcessors-1; if(mNoOfThreads < mRtnValue) mRtnValue = mNoOfThreads; return mRtnValue; } 
Well, millions of simultaneous threads may be practical if using virtual threads found in Project Loom technology built into Java 21+.
More generally known in the industry as fibers, virtual threads under Project Loom run on top of the "real" platform/kernel threads that we already have in Java. Many virtual threads are mapped to each platform/kernel thread.
The virtual threads provide very cheap blocking. When the task on your background thread does file i/o, network calls, database access, logging, and so on, your code blocks, waiting for a response. Project Loom technology detects this blocking, "parks" (sets aside) that virtual thread, and assigns another virtual thread to continue its work on the platform/kernel thread. This parking and switching is very fast. As a result, threaded Java apps will generally see substantial gains in performance.
As a result, a JVM on mainstream computing hardware will be able to support millions of threads.
Caveats:
Using virtual threads is a easy as switching your implementation of ExecutorService:
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor() ; For more info, see this 2021-01-15 article. And see several very good video presentations and interviews by Ron Pressler and other team members. Study more recent materials as Loom has evolved.
ThreadLocal, maintain a stack, and look like platform threads in debuggers.Maximum thread limit mainly depends on hardware, OS and Java stack size.
The following factor plays a very important role to identify max thread limit:-
2^32 for 32-bit architecture and 2^64 for 64-bit architecture)java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version | grep -iE 'ThreadStackSize'PID limit (can be determine by command "cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max")ulimit -uSo max thread limit will be MINIMUM of ((process virtual address space/java stack size), Max PID limit, Max process limit)
e.g. if Max process limit is 2048 and it is minimum of all above mention three-factor then java process will not be able to create a thread more than that.
To verify it one can create simple java application in which he/she can create a thread in a loop and see how much it can go.
Example:
public class ThreadCountTest { private static final Object lock = new Object(); private static int counter = 0; public static void main(String[] _args) { while (true) { new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { synchronized(lock) { counter++; System.err.println("New thread #" + counter); } while (true) { try { Thread.sleep(3000); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } }).start(); } } } Maximum number of threads can also be limited by the JVM implementation and cab be different from a Java virtual machine to another Java virtual machine. For example, in Jikes RVM an array is used to keep information about threads (See line 54 in the Jikes RVM Scheduler source code). In this case, the maximum number of threads cannot exceed the maximum size of an array in Java, which is about 2^32. But you are more likely to hit other OS limits or hardware limits before reaching 2^32 threads.
