linux find regexp

Question

I have a script where I want to find all direct subdirectories that is purely numerical in a folder and copy them to a specified destination. I have issues to get regexp to work with + and * in find. The folder structure in the example is as follows:

0/ 1/ 2/ 3/ 3.02asd/ 3a/ 4/ 44/ 45/ 451/ 452/ 453/ 4531/ 4532/ 45321/ 45322/ 45323/ 666aa/ 66a/ 66aaa/ temp27/

I have gotten this to work with the following commands:

find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9]" | while read f do mv $f $TESTPATH done find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9][0-9]" | while read f do mv $f $TESTPATH done find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9][0-9][0-9]" | while read f do mv $f $TESTPATH done find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" | while read f do mv $f $TESTPATH done find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" | while read f do mv $f $TESTPATH done

Not very nice but it works, but this should probably be possible with something like:

find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9]+"

or

find . -type d -maxdepth 1 -name "[0-9][0-9]*"

But it seems that + doesn't work and * is wildcard it seems.

Paul R · Accepted Answer · 2011-12-02 11:52:42Z

8

Use -regex instead of -name, e.g.

find . -maxdepth 1 -type d -regex ".*/[0-9]*"

edited Dec 2, 2011 at 11:52

answered Dec 2, 2011 at 9:39

Paul R

214k38 gold badges402 silver badges579 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

Daimrod Over a year ago

Becareful, you have to put the -maxdepth 1 option before -type d.

Paul R Over a year ago

@Daimrod: actually I think it works OK either way around - I just tested it to be sure. Performance is probably better if you put the -maxdepth 1 first though.

Daimrod Over a year ago

Yes both works, but I think it's faster and at least you don't have a warning. ;)

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

linux find regexp

1 Answer 1

3 Comments

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

3 Comments

Related