float('nan') represents NaN (not a number). But how do I check for it?
21 Answers
Use math.isnan:
>>> import math >>> x = float('nan') >>> math.isnan(x) True 17 Comments
math.isnan preferred to np.isnan() ?import numpy takes around 15 MB of RAM, whereas import math takes some 0,2 MBnumpy.isnan is a superior choice, as it handles NumPy arrays. If you're not using NumPy, there's no benefit to taking a NumPy dependency and spending the time to load NumPy just for a NaN check (but if you're writing the kind of code that does NaN checks, it's likely you should be using NumPy).float('nan') == float('nan') returns False — which is a strange convention, but basically part of the definition of a NaN. The approach you want is actually the one posted by Chris Jester-Young, below.The usual way to test for a NaN is to see if it's equal to itself:
def isNaN(num): return num != num 16 Comments
np.isnan and math.isnan will both break in this case.nan being the only thing in the universe not equal to itself. AT THE VERY LEAST it should be return isinstance(num, float) and num != num. The overhead of verifying the type is better than the possibility of actually being wrong, which this can be.numpy.isnan(number) tells you if it's NaN or not.
10 Comments
numpy.all(numpy.isnan(data_list)) is also useful if you need to determine if all elements in the list are nanall(map(math.isnan, [float("nan")]*5))Here are three ways where you can test a variable is "NaN" or not.
import pandas as pd import numpy as np import math # For single variable all three libraries return single boolean x1 = float("nan") print(f"It's pd.isna: {pd.isna(x1)}") print(f"It's np.isnan: {np.isnan(x1)}}") print(f"It's math.isnan: {math.isnan(x1)}}") Output:
It's pd.isna: True It's np.isnan: True It's math.isnan: True 7 Comments
pd.isnan() or pd.isna()? That is the question :Dif not np.isnan(x): to be quite useful.pd.isna('foo') is also the only one that can handle strings. np.isnan('foo') and math.isnan('foo') will result in TypeError exception.Editor's note: The below timings are flawed, for example, they have not factored out name lookup time. See the comments.
It seems that checking if it's equal to itself (x != x) is the fastest.
import pandas as pd import numpy as np import math x = float('nan') %timeit x != x 44.8 ns ± 0.152 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each) %timeit math.isnan(x) 94.2 ns ± 0.955 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each) %timeit pd.isna(x) 281 ns ± 5.48 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each) %timeit np.isnan(x) 1.38 µs ± 15.7 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each) 6 Comments
z = float('inf'), z != z evaluates to false.z=float('inf') and then z==z give True. x=float('nan') and then x==x give False.numpy or another tensor library, anyway.x != x and math.isnan(x) disappears; they're both about 35 ns on my system. You can use %timeit in cell mode to check: 1) %%timeit x = float('nan') <newline> x != x 2) %%timeit x = float('nan'); from math import isnan <newline> isnan(x)math.isnan will compete very differently when a function is actually required and x != x would need wrapping in a lambda. A numpy functionality such as numpy.isnan will compete very differently when applied to a numpy array where x != x would require iteration.here is an answer working with:
- NaN implementations respecting IEEE 754 standard
- ie: python's NaN:
float('nan'),numpy.nan...
- ie: python's NaN:
- any other objects: string or whatever (does not raise exceptions if encountered)
A NaN implemented following the standard, is the only value for which the inequality comparison with itself should return True:
def is_nan(x): return (x != x) And some examples:
import numpy as np values = [float('nan'), np.nan, 55, "string", lambda x : x] for value in values: print(f"{repr(value):<8} : {is_nan(value)}") Output:
nan : True nan : True 55 : False 'string' : False <function <lambda> at 0x000000000927BF28> : False 8 Comments
numpy.nan is a regular Python float object, just like the kind returned by float('nan'). Most NaNs you encounter in NumPy will not be the numpy.nan object.numpy.nan defines its NaN value on its own in the underlying library in C. It does not wrap python's NaN. But now, they both comply with IEEE 754 standard as they rely on C99 API.float('nan') is float('nan') (non-unique) and np.nan is np.nan (unique)np.nan is a specific object, while each float('nan') call produces a new object. If you did nan = float('nan'), then you'd get nan is nan too. If you constructed an actual NumPy NaN with something like np.float64('nan'), then you'd get np.float64('nan') is not np.float64('nan') too.I actually just ran into this, but for me it was checking for nan, -inf, or inf. I just used
if float('-inf') < float(num) < float('inf'): This is true for numbers, false for nan and both inf, and will raise an exception for things like strings or other types (which is probably a good thing). Also this does not require importing any libraries like math or numpy (numpy is so damn big it doubles the size of any compiled application).
2 Comments
math.isfinite was not introduced until Python 3.2, so given the answer from @DaveTheScientist was posted in 2012 it was not exactly "reinvent[ing] the wheel" - solution still stands for those working with Python 2.pd.eval expression. For example pd.eval(float('-inf') < float('nan') < float('inf')) will return Falseor compare the number to itself. NaN is always != NaN, otherwise (e.g. if it is a number) the comparison should succeed.
1 Comment
Well I entered this post, because i've had some issues with the function:
math.isnan() There are problem when you run this code:
a = "hello" math.isnan(a) It raises exception. My solution for that is to make another check:
def is_nan(x): return isinstance(x, float) and math.isnan(x) 5 Comments
def is_nan(x): try: return math.isnan(x) except: return FalseComparison pd.isna, math.isnan and np.isnan and their flexibility dealing with different type of objects.
The table below shows if the type of object can be checked with the given method:
+------------+-----+---------+------+--------+------+ | Method | NaN | numeric | None | string | list | +------------+-----+---------+------+--------+------+ | pd.isna | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | | math.isnan | yes | yes | no | no | no | | np.isnan | yes | yes | no | no | yes | <-- # will error on mixed type list +------------+-----+---------+------+--------+------+ pd.isna
The most flexible method to check for different types of missing values.
None of the answers cover the flexibility of pd.isna. While math.isnan and np.isnan will return True for NaN values, you cannot check for different type of objects like None or strings. Both methods will return an error, so checking a list with mixed types will be cumbersom. This while pd.isna is flexible and will return the correct boolean for different kind of types:
In [1]: import pandas as pd In [2]: import numpy as np In [3]: missing_values = [3, None, np.NaN, pd.NA, pd.NaT, '10'] In [4]: pd.isna(missing_values) Out[4]: array([False, True, True, True, True, False]) 2 Comments
With python < 2.6 I ended up with
def isNaN(x): return str(float(x)).lower() == 'nan' This works for me with python 2.5.1 on a Solaris 5.9 box and with python 2.6.5 on Ubuntu 10
1 Comment
-1.#INDI am receiving the data from a web-service that sends NaN as a string 'Nan'. But there could be other sorts of string in my data as well, so a simple float(value) could throw an exception. I used the following variant of the accepted answer:
def isnan(value): try: import math return math.isnan(float(value)) except: return False Requirement:
isnan('hello') == False isnan('NaN') == True isnan(100) == False isnan(float('nan')) = True 5 Comments
try: int(value)value being NaN or not?NaN is (like in python what you could get from float('inf') * 0), and thus although the string 'Hello' is not a number, but it is also not NaN because NaN is still a numeric value!int(value) For all exception, False will be written.All the methods to tell if the variable is NaN or None:
None type
In [1]: from numpy import math In [2]: a = None In [3]: not a Out[3]: True In [4]: len(a or ()) == 0 Out[4]: True In [5]: a == None Out[5]: True In [6]: a is None Out[6]: True In [7]: a != a Out[7]: False In [9]: math.isnan(a) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<ipython-input-9-6d4d8c26d370>", line 1, in <module> math.isnan(a) TypeError: a float is required In [10]: len(a) == 0 Traceback (most recent call last): File "<ipython-input-10-65b72372873e>", line 1, in <module> len(a) == 0 TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len() NaN type
In [11]: b = float('nan') In [12]: b Out[12]: nan In [13]: not b Out[13]: False In [14]: b != b Out[14]: True In [15]: math.isnan(b) Out[15]: True Comments
In Python 3.6 checking on a string value x math.isnan(x) and np.isnan(x) raises an error. So I can't check if the given value is NaN or not if I don't know beforehand it's a number. The following seems to solve this issue
if str(x)=='nan' and type(x)!='str': print ('NaN') else: print ('non NaN') Comments
How to remove NaN (float) item(s) from a list of mixed data types
If you have mixed types in an iterable, here is a solution that does not use numpy:
from math import isnan Z = ['a','b', float('NaN'), 'd', float('1.1024')] [x for x in Z if not ( type(x) == float # let's drop all float values… and isnan(x) # … but only if they are nan )] ['a', 'b', 'd', 1.1024]
Short-circuit evaluation means that isnan will not be called on values that are not of type 'float', as False and (…) quickly evaluates to False without having to evaluate the right-hand side.
Comments
Here it is 2024 and I've been struggling with this. What I found, based on all the suggestions and comments above:
numpy returns nan for blank excel spreadsheet cells. nan is a float.
To test for this,
if type(activity) == float and np.isnan(activity): It also works fine with math.isnan().
You can't use isnan unless you first test for float since running either math.isnan or numpy.isnan on another type (like str) will throw an error.
Comments
If you want to check for values that are not NaN, then negate whatever is used to flag NaNs; pandas has its own dedicated function for flagging non-NaN values.
lst = [1, 2, float('nan')] m1 = [e == e for e in lst] # [True, True, False] m2 = [not math.isnan(e) for e in lst] # [True, True, False] m3 = ~np.isnan(lst) # array([ True, True, False]) m4 = pd.notna(lst) # array([ True, True, False]) This is especially useful if you want to filter values that are not NaN. For ndarray/Series objects, == is vectorized, so it can be used as well.
s = pd.Series(lst) arr = np.array(lst) x = s[s.notna()] y = s[s==s] # `==` is vectorized z = arr[~np.isnan(arr)] # array([1., 2.]) assert (x == y).all() and (x == z).all() Comments
To filter out both empty strings (''), None and NaN values in the 'num_specimen_seen' column, we can use the pd.notna() function from pandas.
import pandas as pd import numpy as np df = pd.DataFrame({ 'num_specimen_seen': [10, 2, 1, '', 34, 'aw', np.NaN, 5, '43', np.nan, 'ed', None, ''] }) for idx, row in df.iterrows(): if pd.notna(row['num_specimen_seen']) and row['num_specimen_seen'] != '': print(idx, row['num_specimen_seen']) This code will skip both NaN and empty strings in the 'num_specimen_seen' column when iterating over the DataFrame.
Comments
for strings in panda take pd.isnull:
if not pd.isnull(atext): for word in nltk.word_tokenize(atext): the function as feature extraction for NLTK
def act_features(atext): features = {} if not pd.isnull(atext): for word in nltk.word_tokenize(atext): if word not in default_stopwords: features['cont({})'.format(word.lower())]=True return features
isinstance(float("nan"), Number);-P