32

I want to manually label equation number ? For example I want to label this equation 3.1 instead of (1) which automatically pops up. Is it also possible in split environment as well or not ?

\begin{equation} \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \label{eq:3.1} \end{equation} 
1
  • 3
    try tag{\thesection.\theequation}; I think this has been asked before somewhere... Commented Mar 10, 2014 at 2:21

4 Answers 4

38

You can use \tag:

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation} \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \tag{3.1}\label{eq:3.1} \end{equation} \end{document} 

Capture of expected output

1
  • 2
    Excellent !! How to do the exact same thing in equation and split environment together ? Commented Mar 10, 2014 at 2:36
19

I guess you are looking for a way to number your equations "within" sections, that is, add the section number before the equation number.

This can be done automatically if you add the line

\numberwithin{equation}{section} 

in your preamble, without any manual intervention.

MWE:

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \numberwithin{equation}{section} \begin{document} \section{Test} Some text \section{Another Test} Some text \section{An equation} \begin{equation} \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \label{eq:3.1} \end{equation} \end{document} 

Output:

enter image description here

13

Personally, I wanted to have "Eq." in front of the equation numbering. I thought you had the same question but then with "equation" instead of "Eq.". Also, I wanted to have the section numbering in front of the equation, so that the equations are numbered as (Eq. 3.1) instead of (1).

I started from How to change equation numbering style.

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} % \numberwithin{equation} doesn't exist without this package. \numberwithin{equation}{section} % This line resets equation numbering when starting a new section. \renewcommand{\theequation}{Eq. \thesection.\arabic{equation}} % This line ads "Eq." in front of your equation numbering. \begin{document} \section{Introduction} \begin{equation} 1+1=3? \end{equation} \begin{equation} 1+1\neq3 \end{equation} \section{Some section or chapter without content...} \section{Content!} \begin{equation} 1+1=2 \end{equation} \begin{equation} 1+2=3 \end{equation} \end{document} 

example of what it should look like

Unfortunately, the order of lines is crucial, because it is possible to override "\renewcommand{\theequation}{Eq. \thesection.\arabic{equation}}" with "\numberwithin{equation}{section}", and you only get (1.1).

Note that if "\numberwithin{equation}{section}" is left out, equation numbering continues after opening a new section, so it numbers like (Eq. 1.1), (Eq. 1.2), (Eq. 3.3), (Eq. 3.4), which is strange.

PS, I don't know why you would like to force a tag to become "equation 3.1", I thought the automatic numbering was a good thing.

2
  • This doesn't answer the question. Commented Feb 21, 2017 at 21:43
  • Sorry for my late response, my previous answer was too short and was lacking a picture. The complete script should print "Eq. 3.1", which answers the question, right? I don't know why you would like to force a tag to become "equation 3.1", I thought the automatic numbering was a good thing.... Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 1:02
3

THis worked for me Thank you

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation}\tag{3.1} \begin{split} \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \tag{3.1}\label{eq:3.1} \end{split} \end{equation} \end{document} 
1
  • I believe only giving tag while doing \begin equation was sufficient. Commented Oct 28, 2020 at 3:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.