24

In review I came across a suggested edit for this question:

The proposed edit ain't bad, just a tiny bit of grammar and wording cleanup. It's not a totally trivial edit, but not a major copy-edit job either. (As I said, mediocre.)

I would have clicked "approve" except I really don't want to encourage the laziness and sloppiness of including the edit message, "Improve blah blah."

I found this related meta post:

But, I haven't seen a post that discussed acceptable edits with a sloppy or uninformative edit message.

What are the options? What do you think should be done in such a case?

1
  • 5
    I had to check whether you said "blah blah" or the edit message. Commented Dec 22, 2016 at 2:56

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
22

Assuming that the suggested edit is good enough that you would consider accepting it, based on its own merits, and ignoring the comment, here’s a possible approach:

The first time you see something like this:

  1. Accept the edit (or improve it).
  2. Leave a comment for the editor asking him to write better comments.  (You can @-ping people who have (successfully) edited a post.  But you’ll have to type (or copy and paste) the user’s name, because it isn’t included in the auto-complete.  And this doesn’t work at all for users who have suggested edits that were rejected.)
  3. Make a note of the user name.

Then, when you see more low-quality edit comments coming from the same users, reject them.

2
  • Thanks for the information in Point 2. The UI for SE sites is excellent so I concluded from the lack of auto-completion that it wasn't possible to notify an editor with a comment. Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 10:51
  • 1
    @AnthonyGeoghegan you may want to vote and comment on this meta proposal. Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 21:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.