16

Super sorry to bikeshed, but this is kind of bugging me.

In network-wide contexts, like people's list of accounts, our description says:

Q&A for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.

I feel like "FreeBSD" is too specific, like saying "users of Arch Linux" instead of GNU/Linux users in general. Can we change it to something like "the BSDs" or "*BSD"? So the final description would end up being something like

Q&A for users of Linux, the BSDs and other Un*x-like operating systems.

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
5

Why do we need to specify anything at all? We could just go for

Q&A for users of Unix and Unix-like operating systems.

or since Linux perhaps should be mentioned explicitly since it is in the site's name:

Q&A for users of Unix, Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.

Also, I don't see the point of Un*x-like, I could understand *nix but that is a synonym of Unix-like so why not just leave it at that? What does Un*x-like convey that Unix-like doesn't?

4
  • 3
    I think it's worthwhile being somewhat more specific since an amazing number of folks are ignorant about Linux/UNIX/BSD. I've run into too many folks who think the BSDs are just other Linux distributions. And "Everything is Linux" has become the new "Everything is a VAX". And as an OpenBSD guy, calling out all the BSDs by saying "the BSDs" would make me happy. Commented Oct 12, 2013 at 15:43
  • 1
    @kurtm I don't see any reason to explicitly include any *nix, Unix and Unix-like covers everything, including BSDs. Mentioning Linux makes sense since there are actually newbie Linux users who might not know what *nix or Unix-like means. I really doubt there are *BSD users who don't. Commented Oct 12, 2013 at 15:46
  • Yes, but I was thinking more for the folks who don't know the others are out there. Getting some of the Linux folks to say "the BSDs? What are they?" But also, I have met folks who know about FreeBSD who don't know about the others. Commented Oct 12, 2013 at 15:51
  • 2
    +1 for @kurtm. I would argue that we might as well mention the BSDs, as there are (potential) benefits but little drawback. It's not like the sentence is a run-on, and "UNIX, Linux and other UNIX-like systems" seems like too awkward a construct to me. Maybe that's just me, though. Commented Oct 12, 2013 at 16:56
1

Meh. The next step would be “Linux, the BSDs, the Unix parts of OSX, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, Unix™, OSF1, Xenix, SCO, Cygwin, the POSIX layer of QNX, MINIX, and other Unix-like operating systems”. I find “the BSDs” awkward. Let's just stick to the most popular of the BSDs, “and other Unix-like operating systems” makes it completely clear that Linux and FreeBSD are just examples.

3
  • We might as well replace "Linux" with "Ubuntu", if you see it that way... Commented Oct 20, 2013 at 14:20
  • @Jop Ubuntu is a distribution, FreeBSD is an OS. Commented Oct 23, 2013 at 15:58
  • 2
    @SlavenRezic The difference isn't absolute. FreeBSD is a distribution as well, and Ubuntu can be called an OS. Commented Oct 23, 2013 at 16:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.