1

Is there a way search backward from the cursor for a line that doesn't contain a pattern?

For example, many of my lines match the regular expression ^ adding: \i\+. I want to find the first line above the current line which doesn't match this pattern, even if it is an empty line.

I don't want to use zero-width matching expressions because I don't want to have to specify a non-zero-width matching portion, which could cause the search to miss some qualifying lines.

I also avoided global commands, including the inverse global command :v, because I want to search backward from the cursor to the first occurrence.

Improve this question
2
  • 1
    I initially thought to try :help pattern; maybe there's a negate-a-pattern syntax? \@! and \@<! looked promising, but I couldn't make them work (i.e., it's not as simple as \(pattern\)\@<!.). Only other thing to add is that ?pattern?-1 takes you to the line above a pattern match, so with hlsearch turned on you could just hold n until you're on an un-highlighted line. Or you could write a while loop to search backwards... Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 0:24
  • I tried paging backward until I saw unhighlighted text, but it's such high volume that detection is unreliable. Other workarounds is to use global with inverse matching to prepend a unique string to nonmatching lines, then search backword for the string. I prefer not to mess with file, and not to assume uniqueness of a string. Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 2:52

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

In your specific case, you can use a zero-width negative match and still have it work on empty lines.

I don't want to use zero-width matching expressions because I don't want to have to specify a non-zero-width matching portion, which could cause the search to miss some qualifying lines.

So you can use the ^ as the matching portion outside the zero-width negative lookahead.

This works:

?^\( adding: \i\+\)\@!

It will properly skip the adding: lines and it will stop on all other lines, including empty ones.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Thanks, filbranden. I ran into problems in the past assuming that positional anchors like ^ counted as matches, but I don't recall the environment (most likely Matlab). Thankfully, not vim. Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 2:58
  • 1
    Damn. I fiddled for ages and couldn’t make this work. Nice job. Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 3:59

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.