How to use the PI constant in C++

C++20 std::numbers::pi

At last, it has arrived: http://eel.is/c++draft/numbers

main.cpp

#include <cfloat> #include <cstdio> #include <numbers> // std::numbers #include <iomanip> #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << std::fixed << std::setprecision(20); std::cout << "float " << std::numbers::pi_v<float> << std::endl; std::cout << "double " << std::numbers::pi << std::endl; std::cout << "long double " << std::numbers::pi_v<long double> << std::endl; std::cout << "exact " << "3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944" << std::endl; printf("\nhex \n"); printf("float %A\n", std::numbers::pi_v<float>); printf("double %A\n", std::numbers::pi); // Doesn't print the result in a very comparable way because %LA // randomly has a different hex grouping than %A. // 0XC.90FDAA22168C235P-2 printf("long double %LA\n", std::numbers::pi_v<long double> - (long double)std::numbers::pi); printf("exact %s\n", "0x1.921FB54442D18469898CC51701B839A252049C1114CF98E803"); printf("\nLDBL_MANT_DIG=%d\n", LDBL_MANT_DIG); } 

Compile and run:

g++ -ggdb3 -O0 -std=c++20 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -o main.out main.cpp ./main.out 

Output:

float 3.14159274101257324219 double 3.14159265358979311600 long double 3.14159265358979323851 exact 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944 hex float 0X1.921FB6P+1 double 0X1.921FB54442D18P+1 long double 0X8.D4P-56 exact 0x1.921FB54442D18469898CC51701B839A252049C1114CF98E803 LDBL_MANT_DIG=64 

It is a bit easier to make sense of the precision of the hex output, remembering that in IEEE 754:

• 23 bit significand
• 52 bit significand
• 112 bit significand

Tested on Ubuntu 20.04 amd64, GCC 10.2.0

The "exact" result was calculated with:

echo "scale=60; 4*a(1)" | BC_LINE_LENGTH=0 bc -l 

as per: How can I calculate pi using Bash command and the hex one was obtained with:

echo "scale=60; obase=16; 4*a(1)/2" | BC_LINE_LENGTH=0 bc -l 

The division by 2 is to align bc hex output to C hex output bits so we can compare them nicely.

The accepted proposal describes:

5.0. “Headers” [headers] In the table [tab:cpp.library.headers], a new <math> header needs to be added.

[...]

namespace std { namespace math { template<typename T > inline constexpr T pi_v = unspecified; inline constexpr double pi = pi_v<double>; 

There is also a std::numbers::e of course :-) How to calculate Euler constant or Euler powered in C++?

These constants use the C++14 variable template feature: C++14 Variable Templates: what is their purpose? Any usage example?

In earlier versions of the draft, the constant was under std::math::pi: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p0631r7.pdf

Pi can be calculated as atan(1)*4. You could calculate the value this way and cache it.

Get it from the FPU unit on chip instead:

double get_PI() { double pi; __asm { fldpi fstp pi } return pi; } double PI = get_PI(); 

You could also use boost, which defines important math constants with maximum accuracy for the requested type (i.e. float vs double).

const double pi = boost::math::constants::pi<double>(); 

Check out the boost documentation for more examples.

I would recommend just typing in pi to the precision you need. This would add no calculation time to your execution, and it would be portable without using any headers or #defines. Calculating acos or atan is always more expensive than using a precalculated value.

const double PI =3.141592653589793238463; const float PI_F=3.14159265358979f; 

Rather than writing

#define _USE_MATH_DEFINES 

I would recommend using -D_USE_MATH_DEFINES or /D_USE_MATH_DEFINES depending on your compiler.

This way you are assured that even in the event of someone including the header before you do (and without the #define) you will still have the constants instead of an obscure compiler error that you will take ages to track down.

Since the official standard library doesn't define a constant PI you would have to define it yourself. So the answer to your question "How can I get PI without defining it manually?" is "You don't -- or you rely on some compiler-specific extensions.". If you're not concerned about portability you could check your compiler's manual for this.

C++ allows you to write

const double PI = std::atan(1.0)*4; 

but the initialization of this constant is not guaranteed to be static. The G++ compiler however handles those math functions as intrinsics and is able to compute this constant expression at compile-time.

From the POSIX specification of <math.h>:

The <math.h> header shall provide for the following constants. The values are of type double and are accurate within the precision of the double type.

• M_PI Value of 𝜋
• M_PI_2 Value of 𝜋/2
• M_PI_4 Value of 𝜋/4
• M_1_PI Value of 1/𝜋
• M_2_PI Value of 2/𝜋
• M_2_SQRTPI Value of 2/√𝜋

Standard C++ doesn't have a constant for PI.

Many C++ compilers define M_PI in cmath (or in math.h for C) as a non-standard extension. You may have to #define _USE_MATH_DEFINES before you can see it.

I would do

template<typename T> T const pi = std::acos(-T(1)); 

or

template<typename T> T const pi = std::arg(-std::log(T(2))); 

I would not typing in π to the precision you need. What is that even supposed to mean? The precision you need is the precision of T, but we know nothing about T.

You might say: What are you talking about? T will be float, double or long double. So, just type in the precision of long double, i.e.

template<typename T> T const pi = static_cast<T>(/* long double precision π */); 

But do you really know that there won't be a new floating point type in the standard in the future with an even higher precision than long double? You don't.

And that's why the first solution is beautiful. You can be quite sure that the standard would overload the trigonometric functions for a new type.

And please, don't say that the evaluation of a trigonometric function at initialization is a performance penalty.

In the C++20 standard library, π is defined as std::numbers::pi_v for float, double and long double, e.g.

#include <numbers> auto n = std::numbers::pi_v<float>; 

and may be specialized for user-defined types.

I use following in one of my common header in the project that covers all bases:

#define _USE_MATH_DEFINES #include <cmath> #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI (3.14159265358979323846) #endif #ifndef M_PIl #define M_PIl (3.14159265358979323846264338327950288) #endif 

On a side note, all of below compilers define M_PI and M_PIl constants if you include <cmath>. There is no need to add `#define _USE_MATH_DEFINES which is only required for VC++.

x86 GCC 4.4+ ARM GCC 4.5+ x86 Clang 3.0+ 

I generally prefer defining my own: const double PI = 2*acos(0.0); because not all implementations provide it for you.

The question of whether this function gets called at runtime or is static'ed out at compile time is usually not an issue, because it only happens once anyway.

I just came across this article by Danny Kalev which has a great tip for C++14 and up.

template<typename T> constexpr T pi = T(3.1415926535897932385); 

I thought this was pretty cool (though I would use the highest precision PI in there I could), especially because templates can use it based on type.

template<typename T> T circular_area(T r) { return pi<T> * r * r; } double darea= circular_area(5.5);//uses pi<double> float farea= circular_area(5.5f);//uses pi<float> 

Values like M_PI, M_PI_2, M_PI_4, etc are not standard C++ so a constexpr seems a better solution. Different const expressions can be formulated that calculate the same pi and it concerns me whether they (all) provide me the full accuracy. The C++ standard does not explicitly mention how to calculate pi. Therefore, I tend to fall back to defining pi manually. I would like to share the solution below which supports all kind of fractions of pi in full accuracy.

#include <ratio> #include <iostream> template<typename RATIO> constexpr double dpipart() { long double const pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899863; return static_cast<double>(pi * RATIO::num / RATIO::den); } int main() { std::cout << dpipart<std::ratio<-1, 6>>() << std::endl; } 

Some elegant solutions. I am doubtful that the precision of the trigonometric functions is equal to the precision of the types though. For those that prefer to write a constant value, this works for g++ :-

template<class T> class X { public: static constexpr T PI = (T) 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419\ 71693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066\ 47093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381\ 964428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460; ... } 

256 decimal digit accuracy should be enough for any future long long long double type. If more are required visit https://www.piday.org/million/.

#include <cmath> const long double pi = acos(-1.L); 

On windows (cygwin + g++), I've found it necessary to add the flag -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 for the preprocessor to process the definition of M_PI in math.h.

You can do this:

#include <cmath> #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI (3.14159265358979323846) #endif 

If M_PI is already defined in cmath, this won't do anything else than include cmath. If M_PI isn't defined (which is the case for example in Visual Studio), it will define it. In both cases, you can use M_PI to get the value of pi.

This value of pi comes from Qt Creator's qmath.h.

You can use that:

#define _USE_MATH_DEFINES // for C++ #include <cmath> #define _USE_MATH_DEFINES // for C #include <math.h> 

Math Constants are not defined in Standard C/C++. To use them, you must first define _USE_MATH_DEFINES and then include cmath or math.h.

I've memorized pi to 11 digits since college (maybe high school), so this is always my preferred approach:

#ifndef PI #define PI 3.14159265359 #endif 

I don't like #defines since they are simple textual substitutions with zero type safety. They can also cause problems using expressions if brackets are omitted e.g.

#define T_PI 2*PI 

should really be

#define T_PI (2*PI) 

My current solution to this problem is to use hard-coded values for constants, e.g. in my_constants.hxx

namespace Constants { constexpr double PI = 3.141... ; } 

However I do not hard-code the values (since I don't like that approach either), instead I use a separate Fortran program to write this file. I use Fortran because it fully supports quad precision (C++ on VisualStudio doesn't) and trig functions are the C++ equivalent of constexpr. E.g.

real(8), parameter :: pi = 4*atan(1.0d0) 

No doubt other languages can be used to do the same thing.

C++14 lets you do static constexpr auto pi = acos(-1);