1
\$\begingroup\$

I have noticed that the has started to become more popular. It is a component of the free UDK engine, so wouldn't it be better as something such as ?

Or is it better if a component is separately labeled?

\$\endgroup\$
0

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4
\$\begingroup\$

The term "kismet" doesn't have any other common meaning in the context of game development, so I don't think there is any danger of ambiguity. Further, I would expect that "kismet" is more discoverable and expected as a tag name than anything prefixed (or suffixed) with "udk."

I don't see a reason to change the tag.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

As far as I know, in the context of game development, Kismet is very specific to UDK (UE4 has Blueprint) so without the term being ambiguous I don't see a need to change the tag to be more explicit.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ As a side note, it is perfectly fine for a question to be tagged with both Kismet and UDK \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 15, 2014 at 23:37

You must log in to answer this question.