5
$\begingroup$

Assume that $M$ is a simple $\mathbb{Z}G$ module with $G$ finitely-generated, virtually nilpotent group.

Take $N\leq G$ to be a normal, finite index, nilpotent subgroup.

The claim is that $M$ has a finite-length composition series as a $\mathbb{Z}N$-module. How can I see this?

One approach I've tried: I know that a module has a finite-length composition series if and only if the module is both Artinian and Noetherian. Now in fact I can prove (with some "heavier" theorems) that $M$ is Noetherian in this case (this follows because $N$ is also finitely generated, and nilpotent, hence polycyclic, in essence). But, this approach doesn't use the fact the $M$ is simple as a $\mathbb{Z}G$-module and moreoever I can't prove the descending-chain-condition anyways.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

If $R$ is a ring, $G$ a group, and $N$ a normal subgroup of finite index, then any simple $RG$-module is semisimple and of finite length (at most $[G:N]$) as an $RN$-module. No other hypotheses about $G,N$ are needed. This result can be found in Passman's "The Algebraic Structure of Group Rings", Theorem 7.2.16. He cites a 1937 paper of A. H. Clifford.

Even more generally, if $A,B$ are rings such that $B$ is a finite normalizing extension of $A$, then any simple $B$-module is semisimple and of finite length as an $A$-module. This is Proposition 10.1.9(ii) in "Noncommutative Noetherian Rings" by McConnell and Robson -- see paragraph 10.1.5 for notation and assumptions. To say $B$ is a finite normalizing extension of $A$ means that there are elements $b_1,\dots,b_k$ that generate $B$ as a left (or right) $A$-module and satisfy $Ab_i=b_iA$ for each $i$.

Here is a sketch of the proof in the group ring case. Let $g_1,\dots,g_k$ be a complete set of coset representatives for $N$ and let $M$ be a simple left $RG$-module. It's easy to see $M$ is finitely generated as an $RN$-module, so it contains a maximal $RN$-submodule $L$. The intersection $\cap_{i=1}^k g_iL$ is an $RG$-submodule of $M$ and so must be zero. This implies that $M$ embeds as an $RN$-submodule in the direct sum of the $RN$-modules $M/g_iL$. Since $g_iL$ is a maximal $RN$-submodule of $M$, each of these factor modules is simple. Hence $M$ is semisimple as an $RN$-module, of length at most $k$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.