0
$\begingroup$

Say we have a function $$f:X\times Y \to \mathbb{R}$$ where $Y\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. I want to calculate $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f(x,y_0+tu_i)$ for a fixed $y_0 \in Y$ and $u_i\in \mathbb{R}^n$ is the i'th standard basis vector for a fixed $i$ and $t\in \mathbb{R}$. Now, just using the chain rule I think we get $$\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f(x,y_0+tu_i)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y_0+tu_i)u_i$$ But we haven't assumed that $f$ is differentiable. We only assume the existence of the partial derivative of $f$ w.r.t the $i$'th coordinate of $y$, so is the above even well-defined?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The important point is not to use the chain rule (since you don't know $f$ is differentiable), but just the definitions. If you're calculating this partial derivative with respect to $t$, you have fixed $x=x_0$ as well. Note that if we set $t=s+t_0$, we have $$\frac d{dt}\Big|_{t=t_0} f(x_0,y_0+tu_i) = \frac d{ds}\Big|_{s=0} f(x_0,(y_0+t_0u_i)+su_i) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y_i}(x_0,y_0+t_0u_i).$$ (The final equality is just the definition of the partial derivative.)

If you don't know that $f(x_0,\cdot)$ is a differentiable function (of $y$), then what you've written doesn't actually make sense.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think I understand, but just to be sure: By definition, the partial derivative is $$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x_0,y_0+(t_0+h)u_i)-f(x_0,y_0+t_0u_i)}{h}$$ $$=\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x_0,y_0+t_0u_i+hu_i)-f(x_0,y_0+t_0u_i)}{h}$$ $$=\frac{\partial f}{\partial y_i}(x_0,y_0+t_0u_i)$$ Because the second expression is the definition of the partial derivative w.r.t $y_i$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 22, 2022 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's correct. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 22, 2022 at 19:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.