Skip to main content

Questions tagged [constructive-mathematics]

The term "constructive mathematics" refers to the discipline in mathematics in which one proves the existence of mathematical objects only by presenting a construction that provides such an object. Indirect proofs involving proof by contradiction and law of excluded middle are considered nonconstructive. Constructivism is the philosophical stance that the only "true" mathematics is constructive mathematics.

1 vote
1 answer
41 views

Find a function continuous nowhere, whose domain and range are both $[0,1]$. My intuition was to start with $f(x)=x$ and exchange to $f(a)=b$, $f(b)=a$ for sufficiently many pairs of $(a,b)$. So I ...
youthdoo's user avatar
  • 4,882
2 votes
1 answer
66 views

Working with the Dedekind real numbers, in a fully constructive, choice-free context: can we show that if $f(x) = x^{2n+1}$ is monotonic? That is, if $x \le y$, then $x^{2n+1} \le y^{2n+1}$? I have ...
Louis Wasserman's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
131 views

In Bishop and Bridges' "Constructive analysis" on page 17 there is a note with explanation that If $f\colon A\to B$, $g\colon B\to A$, and $g(f(a))=a$ for all $a$ in $A$, then the function $...
Pavlo Surzhenko's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
380 views

Consider IZF (Intuitionistic Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory) with the added axiom that there exist two non-emtpy subsets $A, B$ of $\mathbb R$ such that $\mathbb R$ is the disjoint union of $A$ and $B$. ...
Carla_'s user avatar
  • 2,206
3 votes
0 answers
99 views

In the paper, "On Tarski's fixed point theorem" by Giovanni Curi, the notion of abstract inductive definition is explored (as a generalization of Aczel's inductive definitions) in the ...
Ian Ray's user avatar
  • 31
5 votes
1 answer
151 views

For simplicity, let’s assume the axiom of countable choice, that is, any countable product of merely inhabited sets is also merely inhabited. Then we can define Cauchy reals as modulated Cauchy ...
BoZhang's user avatar
  • 650
0 votes
0 answers
140 views

To which extent constructive mathematics can recover classical mathematics? Is there classical theorem about computable objects and operations which can not be proven constructively? I know that many ...
BoZhang's user avatar
  • 650
9 votes
1 answer
281 views

Classically, $\newcommand{\Hom}{\mathrm{Hom}}\newcommand{\IS}{\mathbb{S}}\newcommand{\P}{\mathscr{P}}\newcommand{\upset}{\!\uparrow}$ the Sierpinski space is given by the set $\mathbb{S} = \{0, 1\}$ ...
Jakob Werner's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
42