1
$\begingroup$

I asked this question in https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4236870/528430, but did not get any help.

I got stuck with the following while going through the proof of Lemma 3.21 from the book 'Ergodic Theory: Independence and Dichotomies' by Kerr and Li.

Problem: If $(X,\mu,T)$ is a weakly mixing extension of $(Y,\nu,S)$, then $$\{f\in L^2(X|Y):f\circ T=f\}\subseteq L^{\infty}(Y).$$

Here I recall the following definitions which are used for the above problem.

Definition 1: Let $(X,\mu)$ and $(Y,\nu)$ be two probability measure space. Let $T:X\rightarrow X$ and $S:Y\rightarrow Y$ be two invertible measure preserving transformations. We say that $(X,\mu,T)$ is an extension of $(Y,\nu,S)$ if there is a $T$ invariant conull set $X'\subseteq X$ and an equivariant measurable map $\pi : X'\rightarrow Y$ such that $\mu (\pi^{-1}(A))=\nu (A)$ for all measurable $A\subseteq Y$.

Definition 2: Given an extension $(X,\mu,T)\rightarrow (Y,\nu,S)$, let $\mathbb{E}_Y:L^2(X)\rightarrow L^2(Y)$ be the conditional expectation. Then $L^2(X|Y)$ is the completion of $L^{\infty}(X)$ with respect to the norm $\|f\|:=\|\mathbb{E}_Y(f\cdot\overline{f})\|^{1/2}$.

Definition 3: An element $f\in L^2(X|Y)$ is said to be conditionally weakly mixing if the mean $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{s=-n}^{s=n}\|\mathbb{E}_Y((f\circ T^s)\cdot\overline{f})\|=0.$$

Definition 4: The extension $(X,\mu,T)\rightarrow (Y,\nu,S)$ is said to be weakly mixing if every element in $L^2(X|Y)$ orthogonal to $L^{\infty}(Y)$ is conditionally weakly mixing.

Thanks in advance for any help or suggestion.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
+100
$\begingroup$

I suspect that your confusion stems from misinterpreting the norm on $L^2(X|Y)$ in your definition 2. You should note that $\mathbb{E}_Y$ takes $L^\infty(X)$ to $L^\infty(Y)$ and the new norm taken on $L^\infty(X)$ is with respect to the $L^\infty$-norm on $L^\infty(Y)$, not the $L^2$-norm. That is $\|f\|:=\|\mathbb{E}_Y(f\cdot\overline{f})\|_\infty^{1/2}$ for $f\in L^\infty(X)$.

It is now easy to see that $L^2(X|Y)$ decomposes equivariantly as an $L^\infty(Y)$-Hilbert module to $L^\infty(Y)\oplus L^\infty(Y)^\perp$. Accordingly, you get a corresponding decomposition of $L^2(X|Y)^T$ and you are done by observing that a $T$-invariant weakly mixing element must be 0.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.