This question concerns the definition of dimensional regularization in quantum field theory, specifically as presented in this Wilson paper (see free version here).
This operation must fulfill three axioms:
- (A1) Linearity: $\int (\alpha f(x) + \beta g(x)) d^d x = \alpha \int f(x) d^d x + \beta \int g(x) d^d x.$
- (A2) Invariance under translations $\int f(x+y) d^d x = \int f(x) d^d x.$
- (A3) Scaling: $\int f(s x) d^d x = s^{-d} \int f(x) d^d x.$
Contrary to what is sometimes claimed, this is not an integral over a $d$-dimensional space. Is this scaling property what justifies the name of $d$-dimensional integral.
My question is about the proof that such operation is unique (up to normalisation). Which basically consists on saying that any function $f(x)$ can be written in terms of $e^{-s^2(x+y)^2}$ and the derivatives. With axioms 2 and 3 it is possible to prove that $\int e^{-s^2(x+y)^2} d^d x \propto \int e^{-x^2} d^d x$, therefore they are uniquely determined up to a noramlisation factor give by the value we give to $\int e^{-x^2} d^d x$.
However, in the text between eqs. (A6-7) he says that axiom 1 is enough to prove the same for any function $f$. I don't see why this is true. He seems to be assuming these two properties
$\lim_{n\to \infty} \int f_n(x) d^d x = \int \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) d^d x.$
$\int \frac{\partial}{\partial s} f_s(x)d^d x = \frac{d}{d s} \int f_s(x) d^d x.$
Is there a justification for these two properties following from the axioms? Do you know of other sources where $d$-dimensional integrals are defined with complete rigor?
Note: A related version of this question was posted on Math.SE, but I am reposting it here since its physics implications may be more relevant to this community.