About innerHTML in JavaScript

Question

Is it safe to use innerHTML to make something like this:

newContent = ""; newContent += "<tr>"; newContent += "<td>" + data.fullname + "</td>"; newContent += "<td>" + data.fixedname + "</td>"; newContent += '<td class="text-center"><button id="id_'+a+'" type="button" class="btn btn-xsmall shadow-none">Button</button></td>'; newContent += "</tr>"; document.getElementById("myID").innerHTML += newContent;

The data I get from ajax.

or this:

newContent = "<i class="fa fa-spinner fa-spin fa-fw"></i> Submitting ..."; document.getElementById("myID").innerHTML = newContent;

If not what can I do to substitute it?

I am trying to use setHTML() instead of innerHTML, but I still don't know if I can replace innerHTML with that.

Are there any errors in the console? In the code you presented, variables are not defined with let or var, is that ok? The second code is syntactically bad because it is trying to describe double quotes within double quotes. — Itagaki Fumihiko
– Itagaki Fumihiko, Commented Nov 3, 2022 at 2:34
newContent = "<i class="fa fa-spinner fa-spin fa-fw"></i> Submitting ..."; <-- This is syntactically invalid JavaScript: you need to escape the double-quotes used for attributes. Put newContent = "<i class=\"fa fa-spinner fa-spin fa-fw\"></i> Submitting ..."; instead. — Dai
– Dai, Commented Nov 3, 2022 at 2:35

asportnoy · Accepted Answer · 2022-11-03 02:33:28Z

1

It is not safe. This opens you up to a cross-site scripting attack which can, at best, cause your page to be messed up, but at worse, allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on your website.

In order to make it safe, you need to escape the variable content:

function escapeHtml(unsafe) { return unsafe .replace(/&/g, "&amp;") .replace(/</g, "&lt;") .replace(/>/g, "&gt;") .replace(/"/g, "&quot;") .replace(/'/g, "&#039;"); }

Run your variable through this function and it should be ok to use.

answered Nov 3, 2022 at 2:33

asportnoy

2,5793 gold badges22 silver badges36 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

9 Comments

Kaiido Over a year ago

To be clear, what is unsafe is only the first snippet they used, and only if they don't trust the data they fetched from AJAX. It's perfectly fine to use innerHTML to compose DOM from a fixed markup like in their second snippet, or even from trusted data.

asportnoy Over a year ago

@Kaiido I'd err on the safe side and escape even if you trust the source. Doesn't hurt anything.

Kaiido Over a year ago

Except if what you expect is HTML maybe?

asportnoy Over a year ago

Well yeah, if you're expecting HTML then you can't escape it like this. But that's not applicable in this case since the variable is inside an attribute.

Kaiido Over a year ago

OP is setting the content of <td> elements, there is nothing telling us they don't expect HTML produced by their backend.

|

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

About innerHTML in JavaScript

1 Answer 1

9 Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

9 Comments

Linked

Related