10

I'm sure this question is a duplicate, but I can't find the main question.

If I write $|.|$ it doesn't appear with in my textbook, I wonder what is the correct way to do it. I'm using it to try to write a function $|.|: A \to B$

Improve this question
3

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
14

Do define a command for this. I chose \blank as the name, you might prefer a different one.

Why? Because you want that \blank is

  1. an ordinary math atom
  2. dependable on the required style

Why condition 2? Because your new coauthor might prefer a dash rather than a dot, for instance, or you need to to comply with the house style of some big publisher.

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \newcommand{\blank}{\mathord{{}\cdot{}}} \DeclarePairedDelimiter{\abs}{|}{|} \begin{document} \subsection*{How not using a command might get things wrong} \begin{enumerate} \item \makebox[\width][s]{$|{}\cdot{}|\colon A\to B$} \item \makebox[\width][s]{$|\blank|\colon A\to B$} \item \makebox[0.8\width][s]{$|{}\cdot{}|\colon A\to B$} \item \makebox[0.8\width][s]{$|\blank|\colon A\to B$} \item \makebox[1.2\width][s]{$|{}\cdot{}|\colon A\to B$} \item \makebox[1.2\width][s]{$|\blank|\colon A\to B$} \end{enumerate} \subsection*{Easy to redefine} \begin{enumerate} \item $|\blank|\colon A \to B$ \item $\abs{\blank}\colon A\to B$ \renewcommand{\blank}{\mathord{-}} \item $|\blank|\colon A \to B$ \item $\abs{\blank}\colon A\to B$ \renewcommand{\blank}{\mathord{{}\operatorname{--}{}}} \item $|\blank|\colon A \to B$ \item $\abs{\blank}\colon A\to B$ \end{enumerate} \end{document}

Do you see why I don't recommend something like {}\cdot{}? The simulation of stretching for justification in the first part should clarify it: you don't want that the spaces around the lonely \cdot participate in stretching or shrinking for justification. The \mathord around the construction makes a subformula with frozen spacing and makes it impossible to use \blank outside of math mode. You can see that using \blank always produces the same symbol (consisting of the dot and of the space around it).

In the second part I show a couple of possible redefinitions of \blank.

enter image description here

Improve this answer
4
  • 1
    As far as I can tell, {\cdot} will do the job as well. Is there any reason to use \mathord{\cdot} in favor of {\cdot}? Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 9:30
  • 1
    @antshar This would have smaller spaces around the dot than with {}\cdot{}, which might be a valid style decision; I'd prefer an explicit marker, but that's a personal choice. Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 9:32
  • I've never seen dash used as a placeholder in math for absolute value / norm so cdot is fine I think Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 18:42
  • @qwr I've seen used it as a placeholder in category theory books. Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 19:46
7

Something like this?

enter image description here

Note that I've replaced . with \cdot and that I use \colon rather than :, since the latter is treated by TeX and LaTeX as a relational operator.

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} % for \DeclarePairedDelimiter macro \DeclarePairedDelimiter{\abs}{\lvert}{\rvert} \begin{document} $\abs{ {}\cdot{} }\colon A\to B$ \end{document}
Improve this answer
2
  • 2
    See my answer for possible shortcomings of this approach. Commented Jul 6, 2022 at 9:02
  • 1
    Aside from the shortcomings, this answer uses lvert and rvert which I believe are better that | for typsetting abs. tex.stackexchange.com/questions/498/… Commented Jul 12, 2022 at 21:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.