3

I'm dealing with a frustrating situation. Despite being highly qualified and feeling confident in my work, my supervisors seem to think otherwise.

To give some context: I'm nearing 20 years of teaching experience, have a BA in my subject area, and a master's in pedagogy. I’ve published in my field, taught in a teacher-education program at a college level, and have reached the top of my pay scale—earning more than the administrators in my building. In terms of credentials and professional standing, there's little more I could do that would have any effect. I constantly read, and try to better my craft.

Due to regional teacher shortages, alternative certification programs have become common. These programs allow people to switch careers and enter teaching after passing a few tests and taking community college courses (and sometimes just through tests). As it happens, both my current principal and vice principal came through these programs—and unfortunately, they don't seem to recognize the limitations of their own training.

Since the new administration arrived, I’ve gone from mentoring new teachers to being treated like a novice. They equate direct instruction with learning and dismiss any approach that deviates from that model, even when it’s research-based and widely accepted. For example, I recently gave students a list of words, asked them to infer their meanings, then explain their reasoning to the class—a simple but effective way to build both language and critical thinking skills. Admin assumed I had made a mistake by not first displaying all the words and explaining their definitions. That one moment captures the pattern across every evaluation I’ve received—I use a lot of different strategies to teach, but no matter the approach, they don’t understand what I’m doing, and they assume I’m the one who doesn’t understand.

I feel like every attempt to communicate with them hits a dead end. Despite multiple efforts to explain my approach or strategies, nothing seems to shift their perception. I’m not alone in this—there are a few other smart, capable teachers who feel similarly misunderstood, and they’re facing the same problem: horrible evaluations. They all are choosing to leave.

How can I help administrators recognize I know what I'm doing—so I can continue doing my job properly?

7
  • 3
    Hi, strong question, but could you also give some context on the organisation above the administrators, and how they are appointed? The country would also be useful because it would give cultural context. Commented Apr 8 at 5:01
  • So your superiors don't understand your skills and values, super annoying. Can you explain a bit more how that impacts you and what you would like to achieve? Could you just ignore them and continue to teach well (and hopefully get good results and evaluations)? Do they want you to change your teaching? Commented Apr 8 at 7:51
  • Are your principles and vice principals actually teaching classes? I don’t see how their lack of experience teaching classes necessarily impacts their ability to perform their functions with regards to the teachers under them. They must be able to point to practices that the college accepts has curriculum that’s approved and appropriate. Commented Apr 8 at 11:23
  • 2
    This question is similar to: How to deal with old-school administrators not understanding my methods. If you believe it’s different, please edit the question, make it clear how it’s different and/or how the answers on that question are not helpful for your problem. Commented Apr 8 at 11:35
  • 3
    Unfortunately, this question is missing the real problem. In the US, many such administrators get and keep their jobs through "political" means. Thus, this question assumes that something can be done at the individual teacher level when the problem is the whole school system, the local politics, and the parents. Commented Apr 8 at 14:36

1 Answer 1

0

As it happens, both my current principal and vice principal came through these programs

That is the biggest tangible problem. And the root cause of the situation is why they were chosen, and who chose them. You do not deal with a localized problem (a nice person suddenly turned bully), but with something else.

You do not have many attractive possibilities.

  1. The safest. Just do what you are told. Fsck the teaching of things to others.
  2. The rebel. Continue being a teacher as you did until now. What will happen will happen. You will probably not like it.
  3. The revolutionary. Contact the authority overseeing your school, and complain. They might actually listen to you. Or they will not undo their decision about sending your supervisors to you. It's a gamble.
  4. The guerilla fighter. See if the students and their parents are on your side. If yes, ask them to take the fight on their hands. Many can do more than only one. I do not know what will happen if your supervisors (or their superiors) catch wind of this.
  5. Quit, find another job. Maybe as a teacher, maybe as something else.
2
  • Teacher for 20 years... that's a lot of pension to throw away because you don't like management... Not saying I disagree with the spirit of your ideas... But that's a lot of money to throw away for a transitive problem. Commented Apr 9 at 23:27
  • 1
    @Questor: Will you please clarify? I provided 5 different alternatives. Which one is the offending one, and which alternative did I miss? I will be happy to add it. And how is pension related to anything? Commented Apr 10 at 4:48

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.