I take it that this is early in a class and that you've not yet been taught enough logic manipulation to be able to rigorously develop a desired result here.
Let me start with something quite simple. A NAND is the exact same thing as an OR, with inverted inputs. You can work this out for yourself once you know De Morgan's two laws:
- the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations.
- the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations.
So: \$F_0=\overline{X\cdot Y}=\overline{X}+\overline{Y}\$. Handy to know.
From the above, now:
$$\begin{align*} \overline{X\cdot Y}&=\overline{C} + \left(A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D\right)\\\\ &=\overline{\overline{\overline{C} + \left(A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D\right)}}\\\\ &=\overline{C\cdot\overline{A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D}}\\\\ & & \therefore X &= C\\\\ & & Y&=\overline{A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D} \end{align*}$$
So that is one NAND, as follows:

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
The problem has been reduced. Continue, by focusing on the remaining unresolved portion:
$$\begin{align*} \overline{X\cdot Y}&=\overline{A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D}\\\\ &=\overline{\overline{\overline{A\cdot B + \overline{A}\cdot D}}}\\\\ &=\overline{\overline{\overline{A\cdot B}\:\cdot\:\overline{\overline{A}\cdot D}}}\\\\ & & \therefore X &= \overline{A\cdot B}\\\\ & & Y&=\overline{\overline{A}\cdot D} \end{align*}$$
Clearly, the double-negation we are left with means we need to invert the output of the NAND (to make an AND.) So now:

simulate this circuit
Then quickly:

simulate this circuit
Now, the remainder is also obvious:
$$\begin{align*} \overline{X\cdot Y}&=\overline{\overline{A}\cdot D}\\\\ & & \therefore X &= \overline{A}\\\\ & & Y&=D \end{align*}$$
So:

simulate this circuit
Now, this process works. And it can work for fairly complex expressions, too. But it won't necessarily find optimal solutions. There are methods to help with that process.