0
\$\begingroup\$

I have implemented an isometric grid with rotation in 2 directions in Game Maker. I did this by first calculating the points of the grid in 3D space and then converting them to 2D points through equations I derived from rotation matrices. I use a single object to draw the grid, and would like to be able to click on a tile to select it.

Here are the equations I use to convert the initial 3D points (x, y, z) to isometric 2D points (iso_x, iso_y), where b and a are the angles I'm rotating the grid by:

iso_x = cos_b * x - sin_b * y iso_y = cos_a * sin_b * x + cos_a * cos_b * y + sin_a * z

I attempted to rework the equations to calculate the tile from mouse coordinates, but I've run into the problem where I have 2 knowns (mouse_x, mouse_y) and 3 unknowns (x, y, z), which will make implementing height difficult.

So I guess I'm looking for suggestions on how to do tile picking better, especially when it comes to choosing tiles with height. If you need extra information, I will try to provide it.

I want to keep the rotations, so moving to sprite-based tiles probably won't work because the shape of the tiles will change as the grid rotates.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ The 2 knowns / 3 unknowns mismatch means your solution is a line: a ray traveling through tile space. Instead of a single intersection, you have a family of potential intersections depending on the heights of tiles in your game map (collectively, the third known). You can raycast or march along this ray, one tile at a time, until you hit the first height at which the tile it passes through is non-empty. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2020 at 8:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DMGregory I assume this line runs from the camera through the screen, similar to picking objects in a 3D environment. But I'm using a 2D environment, how would I get the camera position? Or do you think I could get an isometric appearance using something like 3D blocks with an orthographic projection rather than a perspective projection? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2020 at 8:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ You already have a 3D world, you're just doing the 3D to 2D projection manually. It's still the same math we use in 3D transformation with an orthographic matrix. That means you do have a camera viewpoint, it's just implicit in your math rather than explicitly stated. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2020 at 8:38

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.