447

How do I redirect stdout to an arbitrary file in Python?

When a long-running Python script (e.g, web application) is started from within the ssh session and backgounded, and the ssh session is closed, the application will raise IOError and fail the moment it tries to write to stdout. I needed to find a way to make the application and modules output to a file rather than stdout to prevent failure due to IOError. Currently, I employ nohup to redirect output to a file, and that gets the job done, but I was wondering if there was a way to do it without using nohup, out of curiosity.

I have already tried sys.stdout = open('somefile', 'w'), but this does not seem to prevent some external modules from still outputting to terminal (or maybe the sys.stdout = ... line did not fire at all). I know it should work from simpler scripts I've tested on, but I also didn't have time yet to test on a web application yet.

11
  • 13
    That's not really a python thing, it's a shell function. Just run your script like script.p > file Commented Jan 13, 2011 at 0:52
  • I currently solve the problem using nohup, but I thought there might be something more clever... Commented Jan 13, 2011 at 0:59
  • 1
    @foxbunny: nohup? Why simply someprocess | python script.py? Why involve nohup? Commented Jan 13, 2011 at 1:39
  • 6
    Rewrite the print statements to apply the logging module from the stdlib. Then you can redirect output everywhere, have control over how much output you want etc. In most cases production code should not print but log. Commented Jan 3, 2014 at 7:44
  • 5
    Perhaps a better solution for this problem is the screen command, which will save your bash session and allow you to access it from different runs. Commented May 5, 2014 at 23:08

15 Answers 15

582

If you want to do the redirection within the Python script, setting sys.stdout to a file object does the trick:

# for python3 import sys with open('file', 'w') as sys.stdout: print('test') 

A far more common method is to use shell redirection when executing (same on Windows and Linux):

$ python3 foo.py > file 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

16 Comments

It doesn't work with from sys import stdout, maybe because it creates a local copy. Also you can use it with with, e.g. with open('file', 'w') as sys.stdout: functionThatPrints(). You can now implement functionThatPrints() using normal print statements.
It's best to keep a local copy, stdout = sys.stdout so you can put it back when you're done, sys.stdout = stdout. That way if you're being called from a function that uses print you don't screw them up.
@Jan: buffering=0 disables buffering (it may negatively affect performance (10-100 times)). buffering=1 enables line buffering so that you could use tail -f for a line-oriented output.
@mgold or you can use sys.stdout = sys.__stdout__ to get it back.
|
289

There is contextlib.redirect_stdout() function in Python 3.4+:

from contextlib import redirect_stdout with open('help.txt', 'w') as f: with redirect_stdout(f): print('it now prints to `help.text`') 

It is similar to:

import sys from contextlib import contextmanager @contextmanager def redirect_stdout(new_target): old_target, sys.stdout = sys.stdout, new_target # replace sys.stdout try: yield new_target # run some code with the replaced stdout finally: sys.stdout = old_target # restore to the previous value 

that can be used on earlier Python versions. The latter version is not reusable. It can be made one if desired.

It doesn't redirect the stdout at the file descriptors level e.g.:

import os from contextlib import redirect_stdout stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno() with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, redirect_stdout(f): print('redirected to a file') os.write(stdout_fd, b'not redirected') os.system('echo this also is not redirected') 

b'not redirected' and 'echo this also is not redirected' are not redirected to the output.txt file.

To redirect at the file descriptor level, os.dup2() could be used:

import os import sys from contextlib import contextmanager def fileno(file_or_fd): fd = getattr(file_or_fd, 'fileno', lambda: file_or_fd)() if not isinstance(fd, int): raise ValueError("Expected a file (`.fileno()`) or a file descriptor") return fd @contextmanager def stdout_redirected(to=os.devnull, stdout=None): if stdout is None: stdout = sys.stdout stdout_fd = fileno(stdout) # copy stdout_fd before it is overwritten #NOTE: `copied` is inheritable on Windows when duplicating a standard stream with os.fdopen(os.dup(stdout_fd), 'wb') as copied: stdout.flush() # flush library buffers that dup2 knows nothing about try: os.dup2(fileno(to), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&to except ValueError: # filename with open(to, 'wb') as to_file: os.dup2(to_file.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec > to try: yield stdout # allow code to be run with the redirected stdout finally: # restore stdout to its previous value #NOTE: dup2 makes stdout_fd inheritable unconditionally stdout.flush() os.dup2(copied.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&copied 

The same example works now if stdout_redirected() is used instead of redirect_stdout():

import os import sys stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno() with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, stdout_redirected(f): print('redirected to a file') os.write(stdout_fd, b'it is redirected now\n') os.system('echo this is also redirected') print('this is goes back to stdout') 

The output that previously was printed on stdout now goes to output.txt as long as stdout_redirected() context manager is active.

Note: stdout.flush() does not flush C stdio buffers on Python 3 where I/O is implemented directly on read()/write() system calls. To flush all open C stdio output streams, you could call libc.fflush(None) explicitly if some C extension uses stdio-based I/O:

try: import ctypes from ctypes.util import find_library except ImportError: libc = None else: try: libc = ctypes.cdll.msvcrt # Windows except OSError: libc = ctypes.cdll.LoadLibrary(find_library('c')) def flush(stream): try: libc.fflush(None) stream.flush() except (AttributeError, ValueError, IOError): pass # unsupported 

You could use stdout parameter to redirect other streams, not only sys.stdout e.g., to merge sys.stderr and sys.stdout:

def merged_stderr_stdout(): # $ exec 2>&1 return stdout_redirected(to=sys.stdout, stdout=sys.stderr) 

Example:

from __future__ import print_function import sys with merged_stderr_stdout(): print('this is printed on stdout') print('this is also printed on stdout', file=sys.stderr) 

Note: stdout_redirected() mixes buffered I/O (sys.stdout usually) and unbuffered I/O (operations on file descriptors directly). Beware, there could be buffering issues.

To answer, your edit: you could use python-daemon to daemonize your script and use logging module (as @erikb85 suggested) instead of print statements and merely redirecting stdout for your long-running Python script that you run using nohup now.

10 Comments

stdout_redirected is helpful. Be aware this doesn't work inside doctests, since the special SpoofOut handler doctest uses to replace sys.stdout doesn't have a fileno attribute.
@ChrisJohnson: If it doesn't raise ValueError("Expected a file (`.fileno()`) or a file descriptor") then it is a bug. Are you sure it doesn't raise it?
It does raise that error, which is what make it not usable within a doctest. To use your function within a doctest, it appears necessary to specify doctest.sys.__stdout__ where we would normally use sys.stdout. This isn't a problem with your function, just an accommodation required for doctest since it replaces stdout with an object that doesn't have all the attributes a true file would.
stdout_redirected() has stdout parameter, you could set it to sys.__stdout__ if you want to redirect the original python stdout (that should have a valid .fileno() in most cases). It does nothing for the current sys.stdout if they are different. Don't use doctest.sys; it is available by accident.
This really works well, i.e. redirect stdout and stderr to a fd: with stdout_redirected(to=fd): with merged_stderr_stdout(): print('...'); print('...', file=sys.stderr)
|
104

you can try this too much better

import sys class Logger(object): def __init__(self, filename="Default.log"): self.terminal = sys.stdout self.log = open(filename, "a") def write(self, message): self.terminal.write(message) self.log.write(message) sys.stdout = Logger("yourlogfilename.txt") print "Hello world !" # this is should be saved in yourlogfilename.txt 

9 Comments

This will have consequences for code which assumes sys.stdout is a full fledged file object with methods such as fileno() (which includes code in the python standard library). I would add a __getattr__(self, attr) method to that which defers attribute lookup to self.terminal. def __getattr__(self, attr): return getattr(self.terminal, attr)
You have to add def flush(self): method as well to class Logger.
@loretoparisi what would the flush method do?
@elkshadow5 the flush will end up accumulating char in the buffer, print out and clean the buffer.
@loretoparisi but what actually goes in the method that you create?
|
33

The other answers didn't cover the case where you want forked processes to share your new stdout.

To do that:

from os import open, close, dup, O_WRONLY old = dup(1) close(1) open("file", O_WRONLY) # should open on 1 ..... do stuff and then restore close(1) dup(old) # should dup to 1 close(old) # get rid of left overs 

6 Comments

one needs to replace the 'w' attribute with, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_CREATE ... can't send strings into the "os" commands!
Insert a sys.stdout.flush() before the close(1) statement to make sure the redirect 'file' file gets the output. Also, you can use a tempfile.mkstemp() file in place of 'file'. And be careful you don't have other threads running that can steal the os's first file handle after the os.close(1) but before the 'file' is opened to use the handle.
its os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT ... there is no E on there.
@Ch'marr It's O_CREAT, not O_CREATE.
|
31

Quoted from PEP 343 -- The "with" Statement (added import statement):

Redirect stdout temporarily:

import sys from contextlib import contextmanager @contextmanager def stdout_redirected(new_stdout): save_stdout = sys.stdout sys.stdout = new_stdout try: yield None finally: sys.stdout = save_stdout 

Used as follows:

with open(filename, "w") as f: with stdout_redirected(f): print "Hello world" 

This isn't thread-safe, of course, but neither is doing this same dance manually. In single-threaded programs (for example in scripts) it is a popular way of doing things.

2 Comments

+1. Note: it doesn't work for subprocesses e.g., os.system('echo not redirected'). My answer shows how to redirect such output
starting from Python 3.4 there is redirect_stdout in contextlib
14
import sys sys.stdout = open('stdout.txt', 'w') 

Comments

7

Here is a variation of Yuda Prawira answer:

  • implement flush() and all the file attributes
  • write it as a contextmanager
  • capture stderr also

.

import contextlib, sys @contextlib.contextmanager def log_print(file): # capture all outputs to a log file while still printing it class Logger: def __init__(self, file): self.terminal = sys.stdout self.log = file def write(self, message): self.terminal.write(message) self.log.write(message) def __getattr__(self, attr): return getattr(self.terminal, attr) logger = Logger(file) _stdout = sys.stdout _stderr = sys.stderr sys.stdout = logger sys.stderr = logger try: yield logger.log finally: sys.stdout = _stdout sys.stderr = _stderr with log_print(open('mylogfile.log', 'w')): print('hello world') print('hello world on stderr', file=sys.stderr) # you can capture the output to a string with: # with log_print(io.StringIO()) as log: # .... # print('[captured output]', log.getvalue()) 

Comments

5

You need a terminal multiplexer like either tmux or GNU screen

I'm surprised that a small comment by Ryan Amos' to the original question is the only mention of a solution far preferable to all the others on offer, no matter how clever the python trickery may be and how many upvotes they've received. Further to Ryan's comment, tmux is a nice alternative to GNU screen.

But the principle is the same: if you ever find yourself wanting to leave a terminal job running while you log-out, head to the cafe for a sandwich, pop to the bathroom, go home (etc) and then later, reconnect to your terminal session from anywhere or any computer as though you'd never been away, terminal multiplexers are the answer. Think of them as VNC or remote desktop for terminal sessions. Anything else is a workaround. As a bonus, when the boss and/or partner comes in and you inadvertently ctrl-w / cmd-w your terminal window instead of your browser window with its dodgy content, you won't have lost the last 18 hours-worth of processing!

1 Comment

while it is a good answer for the part of the question appeared after the edit; it does not answer the question in the title (most people come here from google for the title)
3

Based on this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5916874/1060344, here is another way I figured out which I use in one of my projects. For whatever you replace sys.stderr or sys.stdout with, you have to make sure that the replacement complies with file interface, especially if this is something you are doing because stderr/stdout are used in some other library that is not under your control. That library may be using other methods of file object.

Check out this way where I still let everything go do stderr/stdout (or any file for that matter) and also send the message to a log file using Python's logging facility (but you can really do anything with this):

class FileToLogInterface(file): ''' Interface to make sure that everytime anything is written to stderr, it is also forwarded to a file. ''' def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): if 'cfg' not in kwargs: raise TypeError('argument cfg is required.') else: if not isinstance(kwargs['cfg'], config.Config): raise TypeError( 'argument cfg should be a valid ' 'PostSegmentation configuration object i.e. ' 'postsegmentation.config.Config') self._cfg = kwargs['cfg'] kwargs.pop('cfg') self._logger = logging.getlogger('access_log') super(FileToLogInterface, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) def write(self, msg): super(FileToLogInterface, self).write(msg) self._logger.info(msg) 

Comments

1

Programs written in other languages (e.g. C) have to do special magic (called double-forking) expressly to detach from the terminal (and to prevent zombie processes). So, I think the best solution is to emulate them.

A plus of re-executing your program is, you can choose redirections on the command-line, e.g. /usr/bin/python mycoolscript.py 2>&1 1>/dev/null

See this post for more info: What is the reason for performing a double fork when creating a daemon?

1 Comment

Eh... can't say I'm a fan of processes managing their own double-forking. It's so common an idiom, and so easy to code wrong if you aren't careful. Better to write your process to run in the foreground, and use a system background task manager (systemd, upstart) or other utility (daemon(1)) to handle the forking boilerplate.
1

I know this question is answered (using python abc.py > output.log 2>&1 ), but I still have to say:

When writing your program, don't write to stdout. Always use logging to output whatever you want. That would give you a lot of freedom in the future when you want to redirect, filter, rotate the output files.

Comments

1

As mentioned by @jfs, most solutions will not properly handle some types of stdout output such as that from C extensions. There is a module that takes care of all this on PyPI called wurlitzer. You just need its sys_pipes context manager. It's as easy as using:

from contextlib import redirect_stdout import os from wurlitzer import sys_pipes log = open("test.log", "a") with redirect_stdout(log), sys_pipes(): print("print statement") os.system("echo echo call") 

Comments

0

Based on previous answers on this post I wrote this class for myself as a more compact and flexible way of redirecting the output of pieces of code - here just to a list - and ensure that the output is normalized afterwards.

class out_to_lt(): def __init__(self, lt): if type(lt) == list: self.lt = lt else: raise Exception("Need to pass a list") def __enter__(self): import sys self._sys = sys self._stdout = sys.stdout sys.stdout = self return self def write(self,txt): self.lt.append(txt) def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback): self._sys.stdout = self._stdout 

Used as:

lt = [] with out_to_lt(lt) as o: print("Test 123\n\n") print(help(str)) 

Updating. Just found a scenario where I had to add two extra methods, but was easy to adapt:

class out_to_lt(): ... def isatty(self): return True #True: You're running in a real terminal, False:You're being piped, redirected, cron def flush(self): pass 

Comments

0

There are other versions using context but nothing this simple. I actually just googled to double check it would work and was surprised not to see it, so for other people looking for a quick solution that is safe and directed at only the code within the context block, here it is:

import sys with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout: print('Testing 1 2 3') 

Tested like so:

$ cat redirect_stdout.py import sys with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout: print('Testing 1 2 3') $ python redirect_stdout.py $ cat test_file Testing 1 2 3 

Comments

0

For those interested, I extend the question. I need to write to log file for a while, then close it, rename it and use normal stdout afterwards. How do I do it?

print("Start program") import os import sys sys.stdout.flush() sys.stdout=open("xxxtmp", "wt") print("xxx") sys.stdout.close() sys.stdout = sys.__stdout__ os.rename("xxxtmp", "xxx") print("End program") 

On stdout there will be:

Start program End program 

In xxx there will be:

xxx 

If the program exits abnormally, the xxx file won't exist.

Comments