0
$\begingroup$

While exploring the relationship between characteristic equations and recurrence relations in linear algebra, I discovered their connection to the Fibonacci sequence.

Let's say there is a recurrence relation $a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}$. The order of this recurrence relation is $2$. Substituting this into a new framework $x^n$, we get $x^n = x^{n-1} +x^{n-2}$, and restricting $n$ by order, we get $x^2 = x+1$. Now, if we rearrange this equation into binomial form $x^2-x-1=0$, the solutions to this equation are $x=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2} , \frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}$. A linear combination of a specific constant multiple of these two solutions becomes the general term of this recurrence relation. So, $a_n = k_1 \times x_{1}^{n} + k_2 \times x_{2}^{n}$ is obtained, and if we find a specific constant multiple $(k_1, k_2)$ through the initial conditions, the general term of the above recurrence relation is $$a_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} \times (\frac {1+\sqrt{5}}{2})^n - \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} \times (\frac {1-\sqrt{5}}{2})^n,$$ which is the general term of the Fibonacci sequence.

Furthermore, the decomposition theorem emerges during the process of factoring and connecting characteristic equations. Then, if we briefly turn our attention to eigenvectors, we see that in this branch, eigenvalues ​​overlap, leading to a shortage of eigenvectors. Therefore, we can transform to Jordan form, a process similar to diagonalization.

As I studied linear algebra, I realized that the concepts of eigenvectors, diagonalization, decomposition theorem, and Jordan form all stem from a single narrative.

Therefore, I want to elaborate on this story and understand the rationale and motivation behind these developments.

$\endgroup$
10
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Basic question that can be asked all over mathematics: Decompose a given structure into indecomposable substructures (i.e., substructures that are independent of one another and cannot be decomposed further). If the structure is "vector space with an endomorphism", then this leads to diagonalization (in the nice cases), the Jordan normal form (in the less nice cases) and the rational canonical form (in the even less nice cases, when the base field is not algebraically closed). This is the call to adventure; the narrative is found in any good textbook on the three above-mentioned forms. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 1:39
  • $\begingroup$ an example of one side of this. math.stackexchange.com/questions/2749300/… $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 1:54
  • $\begingroup$ @WillJagy Hello, thank you for your comment! I will see it. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 4:16
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You are asking for someone to write a book for you, user1274233. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 6:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gerry Myerson One can consider that these books about linear algebra have already been written in a rather narrative style by Gilbert Strang ("Introduction to linear algebra" and "Learning from data") $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 2 at 15:07

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.